🐻⬇️🏀

Shippensburg

Also known as: Shippensburg
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 684 (#536) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 682 (#532) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 784 (#681) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → -20.0 (#286) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → -13.9 (#548) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.114 (#527) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -24.4 More → 0.032 (#431) NetEff -24.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -18.4 More → 0.107 (#587) AdjNet -18.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -17.9 More → 0.107 (#586) AdjNet -17.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 57.8 | AdjD 68.1 More → 0.281 (#572) AdjO 57.8 | AdjD 68.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 55.2 | AdjD 68.2 More → 0.235 (#651) AdjO 55.2 | AdjD 68.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.134 (#638) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.142 (#643) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 103 | GP 23 More → 707 (#506) RD 103 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-14 vs Fayetteville St. L 37 - 52
2025-11-15 vs Lincoln (PA) W 59 - 55
2025-11-19 vs Point Park L 50 - 56
2025-11-24 @ Bowie St. L 54 - 83
2025-12-01 @ Chestnut Hill L 76 - 89
2025-12-05 vs Bowie St. L 37 - 71
2025-12-13 @ Pitt.-Johnstown L 68 - 85
2025-12-16 @ California (PA) L 51 - 82
2025-12-20 vs Slippery Rock L 64 - 69
2025-12-21 vs Edinboro L 53 - 84
2026-01-02 @ Gannon L 30 - 62
2026-01-03 @ Clarion L 61 - 71
2026-01-10 @ West Chester L 51 - 66
2026-01-13 vs Millersville L 59 - 79
2026-01-15 vs Kutztown L 54 - 64
2026-01-17 vs East Stroudsburg L 49 - 64
2026-01-24 @ Mansfield W 83 - 73
2026-01-29 vs Lock Haven L 50 - 81
2026-01-31 vs Bloomsburg L 51 - 63
2026-02-02 @ Shepherd L 57 - 72
2026-02-04 @ Millersville L 61 - 65
2026-02-07 vs West Chester W 67 - 45

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
EYER, Melana - 1 39.0 21.0 5.0 7.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 17.0 15.0 - - - 47.1 22.2 75.0 - 56.0 52.9
MARTON, Lauren - 1 16.0 13.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 10.0 - - - 83.3 50.0 66.7 - 88.8 91.7
Michelle Olak - 20 31.6 12.4 5.8 0.9 0.6 0.9 3.2 9.2 8.2 -213 -10.1 -30.4 51.6 33.3 60.4 -0.17 55.3 52.4
THOMAS, McKenzie - 1 38.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 4.0 - - - 40.0 50.0 50.0 - 46.8 45.0
Melana Eyer - 21 35.8 10.4 4.1 2.8 1.1 0.5 3.5 11.8 3.7 -231 -10.5 -29.1 29.1 25.8 82.7 -0.39 40.6 35.6
OLAK, Michelle - 1 27.0 10.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 - - - 71.4 0 0 - 71.4 71.4
JOHNS, Abbie - 1 26.0 10.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 - - - 42.9 0.0 80.0 - 54.3 42.9
Abbie Johns - 21 33.9 9.8 3.5 1.3 0.8 0.2 2.5 10.3 2.8 -280 -12.7 -40.6 34.1 24.4 71.4 -0.02 43.0 39.2
HARDY, Kiara - 1 17.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 - - - 80.0 0 0.0 - 59.2 80.0
McKenzie Thomas - 21 25.2 5.9 2.7 0.8 0.8 0.2 3.0 6.5 0.9 -219 -10.0 -44.0 32.4 25.6 75.8 -0.71 41.2 36.4
Kiara Hardy - 21 24.8 5.2 4.2 1.7 1.6 0.2 1.9 5.0 6.0 -185 -8.4 -39.9 41.0 25.0 50.0 -0.2 43.8 41.4
Lauren Marton - 16 17.9 5.1 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.4 1.8 5.3 2.3 -174 -10.9 -147.7 35.3 45.5 68.0 -2.06 42.7 38.2
Makayla Foddrell - 21 27.9 4.8 5.8 1.3 0.9 0.2 2.9 5.0 5.1 -143 -6.5 -23.8 34.0 0.0 55.8 1.25 39.2 34.0
FODDRELL, Makayla - 1 27.0 3.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 4.0 -2.0 - - - 25.0 0 50.0 - 30.7 25.0
Mackenzie Stoner - 17 9.3 2.3 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 2.5 0.9 -45 -2.5 -25.5 35.7 35.7 80.0 -0.39 44.1 41.7
Allie Mumau - 4 8.6 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.0 0.5 -15 -3.8 -18.7 50.0 0.0 100.0 0.62 61.5 50.0
Riley Watson - 15 5.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.5 1.0 -33 -2.1 -30.7 62.5 100.0 50.0 0.4 67.6 68.8
Zaria Spann - 9 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 -2 -0.2 -27.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 -0.1 21.6 0.0
MUMAU, Allie - 1 10.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG