San Francisco
2022 Team Stats (5 games)
72.8
PPG
67.4
Opp
+10.3
Margin
42.2%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
65.9%
FT%
33.6
RPG
9.4
APG
11.2
TO
80.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1214 (#120) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1356 (#68) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1082 (#75) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.0 (#59) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +23.8 (#36) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.781 (#9) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.247 (#198) | NetEff -10.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.813 (#21) | AdjNet +12.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.817 (#20) | AdjNet +12.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.737 (#22) | AdjO 77.3 | AdjD 65.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.909 (#28) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.887 (#28) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1240 (#50) | RD 121 | GP 30 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Bouyea
|
- | 14 | 38.4 | 17.6 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 21.1 | - | - | - | 42.0 | 36.1 | 72.2 | 1.94 | 128.2 | 49.4 |
Y. Massalski
|
- | 16 | 28.8 | 14.4 | 10.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 24.9 | 203 | 6.3 | 9.5 | 51.5 | 100.0 | 43.8 | 1.47 | 288.5 | 53.0 |
K. Shabazz
|
- | 30 | 30.1 | 13.6 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 15.1 | 256 | 7.5 | 10.2 | 35.4 | 33.3 | 81.2 | 1.85 | 170.4 | 44.2 |
G. Stefanini
|
G | 18 | 24.4 | 8.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 8.7 | 202 | 5.9 | 9.8 | 29.6 | 31.2 | 66.7 | 1.59 | 235.8 | 38.9 |
T. Lucas
|
G | 3 | 28.3 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 121 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.11 | 0 | 0 |
J. Rishwain
|
- | 18 | 19.2 | 6.1 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 86 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 48.7 | 45.8 | 71.4 | -0.31 | 120.7 | 62.8 |
P. Tape
|
F | 14 | 24.8 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 10.8 | 145 | 4.3 | 8.3 | 58.8 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.44 | 177.6 | 61.8 |
Z. Meeks
|
- | 25 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 6.9 | 123 | 4.6 | 12.5 | 59.1 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 1.22 | 246.9 | 77.3 |
J. Kunen
|
- | 30 | 19.5 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0.43 | 215.1 | 59.6 |
J. Leblanc Sr.
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Newbury
|
- | 10 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 2159.1 | 0 |
V. Markovetskyy
|
- | 23 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.05 | 295.9 | 80.0 |
I. Hawthorne
|
- | 6 | 6.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 11 | 1.6 | 10.9 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 0.14 | 105.4 | 50.0 |
D. Ryuny
|
- | 3 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 29 | 1.5 | 5.8 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.2 | 75.0 | 75.0 |
B. Whitaker
|
- | 2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A. Roy
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
M. Dusanic
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
R. Maitre
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -81 | -2.7 | -12.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.11 | 0 | 0 |
M. Silveira
|
C | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.02 | 0 | 0 |
A. Smith
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 18 | 2.2 | 19.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 |
M. Vail
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15 | 0.9 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 0 |
J. Bieker
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8 | 0.8 | 8.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 |
Y. Harvey
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG