🐻⬇️🏀

Sam Houston

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2022 2020
Also known as: Sam Houston
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1036 (#271) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1006 (#396) HCA +62 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +47.4 (#32) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 1.000 (#103) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +52.9 More → 0.998 (#70) AdjNet +52.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +52.1 More → 0.998 (#68) AdjNet +52.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 85.7 | AdjD 48.8 More → 0.966 (#62) AdjO 85.7 | AdjD 48.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 83.6 | AdjD 57.2 More → 0.916 (#13) AdjO 83.6 | AdjD 57.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.943 (#32) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.932 (#33) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 279 | GP 1 More → 1045 (#261) RD 279 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-12-28 vs Dallas W 110 - 38

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Fanta Kone - 1 26.0 22.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 12.0 30.0 - - - 75.0 100.0 50.0 - 85.4 87.5
Blessing Okoh - 1 14.0 14.0 7.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 15.0 - - - 57.1 0.0 100.0 - 72.6 57.1
Whitney Dunn - 1 18.3 14.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 9.0 10.0 - - - 66.7 33.3 50.0 - 70.9 72.2
Kaylie Carr - 1 21.3 13.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 11.0 9.0 - - - 54.5 33.3 0 - 59.1 59.1
Bryana Block - 1 17.0 11.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 8.0 - - - 44.4 50.0 0 - 61.1 61.1
Deborah Ogayemi - 1 19.2 9.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 11.0 - - - 50.0 0 60.0 - 54.9 50.0
Alaisha Brown - 1 14.3 8.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 8.0 14 1.4 37.3 50.0 0 100.0 -0.51 69.4 50.0
Aysia Ward-Strong - 1 24.1 8.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 23.0 - - - 57.1 0.0 0.0 - 50.8 57.1
Nyla Inmon - 1 16.4 5.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 - - - 50.0 0 50.0 - 51.2 50.0
Esther Rodellar - 1 12.8 4.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 - - - 16.7 0.0 100.0 - 29.1 16.7
Lea Salinas Beamen - 1 16.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 - - - 33.3 0 0 - 33.3 33.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG