Salem (NC)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 692 (#534) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 721 (#523) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 773 (#685) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -27.1 (#297) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -18.4 (#582) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.109 (#530) | - |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.026 (#598) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.108 (#584) | AdjNet -18.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.035 (#648) | AdjNet -28.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.107 (#587) | AdjNet -17.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.032 (#651) | AdjNet -28.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.236 (#598) | AdjO 71.4 | AdjD 84.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.157 (#645) | AdjO 54.5 | AdjD 73.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.146 (#682) | AdjO 47.0 | AdjD 66.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.074 (#670) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.079 (#675) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 661 (#520) | RD 113 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | West Chester | L | 33 - 72 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Kutztown | L | 35 - 71 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Marshall | L | 31 - 105 |
| 2025-11-20 | vs | West Va. Tech | L | 57 - 59 |
| 2025-12-01 | @ | UC Clermont | W | 97 - 75 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | West Liberty | L | 50 - 71 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Wheeling | L | 27 - 67 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | West Va. Wesleyan | L | 43 - 71 |
| 2025-12-17 | vs | Glenville St. | L | 58 - 105 |
| 2025-12-31 | @ | Youngstown St. | L | 20 - 97 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Concord | L | 59 - 81 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Charleston (WV) | L | 44 - 57 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Frostburg St. | L | 57 - 68 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Fairmont St. | L | 55 - 75 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Wheeling | L | 46 - 60 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Point Park | L | 42 - 71 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | West Va. Wesleyan | L | 59 - 83 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Davis & Elkins | W | 72 - 40 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Concord | L | 51 - 68 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Glenville St. | L | 68 - 98 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamarise Jackson | - | 1 | 21.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 9.0 | 12 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 38.5 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 0.78 | 44.0 | 42.3 |
| Selena Frost | - | 9 | 27.9 | 12.1 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 11.2 | 6.0 | -36 | -3.6 | -10.4 | 37.6 | 37.0 | 76.2 | 1.6 | 49.4 | 46.0 |
| Nakayla Green | - | 20 | 31.1 | 9.3 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 11.1 | 0.1 | -177 | -9.3 | -34.7 | 27.9 | 22.8 | 73.5 | -3.14 | 38.2 | 33.8 |
| Meilin Guo | - | 17 | 25.3 | 8.9 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 8.9 | 5.3 | -77 | -4.5 | -15.2 | 42.1 | 33.3 | 60.0 | 0.33 | 45.1 | 42.8 |
| Briana Bunkley | - | 3 | 15.4 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 8.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 42.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 43.5 | 42.3 |
| Batoul Khaleefah | - | 20 | 22.9 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 8.6 | 0.2 | -155 | -8.2 | -43.7 | 30.4 | 22.6 | 70.8 | -1.68 | 37.2 | 34.5 |
| Fatima Bagayoko | - | 1 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 25.5 | 20.0 |
| Taja Brown | - | 16 | 24.4 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 7.4 | 2.1 | -83 | -5.9 | -34.8 | 26.1 | 0.0 | 75.6 | -5.36 | 33.9 | 26.1 |
| Aleeya Silver | - | 6 | 19.8 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 2.2 | -80 | -16.0 | -100.2 | 31.2 | 11.1 | 61.5 | -2.07 | 38.4 | 32.8 |
| Akhia Miller | - | 20 | 23.1 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 4.4 | -225 | -11.2 | -51.9 | 40.9 | 18.8 | 57.1 | -3.58 | 44.7 | 42.6 |
| Fatima Bakayoko | - | 14 | 14.5 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 0.6 | -106 | -8.2 | -50.8 | 28.4 | 13.6 | 73.3 | -1.97 | 35.3 | 30.6 |
| Kamarice Jackson | - | 18 | 16.5 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 5.6 | 0.8 | -87 | -4.8 | -28.3 | 23.0 | 11.6 | 47.1 | -1.76 | 27.4 | 25.5 |
| Ida Bengtsson | - | 1 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Ida Bengstsson | - | 10 | 15.5 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | -49 | -3.8 | -29.3 | 16.7 | 7.7 | 66.7 | 1.12 | 26.9 | 18.3 |
| Kori Pillette | - | 19 | 24.1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.6 | -115 | -6.1 | -33.7 | 18.8 | 15.4 | 53.8 | -1.65 | 28.6 | 20.8 |
| Danika Prescott | - | 15 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 6 | 0.5 | 10.2 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 1.45 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Renee Timbers | - | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG