Saint Anselm
Season:
2026
Also known as: Saint Anselm
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1019 (#327) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1062 (#224) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1017 (#309) | HCA +56 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +17.3 (#149) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.986 (#188) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.980 (#73) | AdjNet +34.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.981 (#84) | AdjNet +34.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.887 (#109) | AdjO 77.2 | AdjD 54.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.600 (#214) | AdjO 74.9 | AdjD 70.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.814 (#86) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.774 (#109) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1088 (#208) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Griffin | - | 1 | 19.9 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 71.4 | - | 74.5 | 72.2 |
| Josh Morissette | - | 1 | 26.4 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 44.4 | 0 | - | 58.3 | 58.3 |
| Will Davies | - | 1 | 30.9 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 61.5 | 56.2 |
| Jack Medalie | - | 1 | 22.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 66.7 | - | 52.1 | 41.7 |
| Jovan Ristic | - | 1 | 28.2 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 15.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 46.1 | 43.8 |
| Paulius Rapolis | - | 1 | 16.5 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 50.9 | 50.0 |
| Hayden Johns | - | 1 | 20.7 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 21.8 | 16.7 |
| Edward Onyia | - | 1 | 23.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 25.5 | 20.0 |
| Jakye Rainey | - | 1 | 11.9 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG