🐻⬇️🏀

SIU Edwardsville

Also known as: SIU Edwardsville Cougars
Program History

2022 Team Stats (1 games)

73.0
PPG
69.8
Opp
-2.3
Margin
50.0%
FG%
44.4%
3P%
50.0%
FT%
33.0
RPG
9.0
APG
11.0
TO
75.4
Pace

Model Outputs

2021-2022
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1048 (#237) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1066 (#263) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More → 929 (#577) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +17.7 (#258) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More → +2.6 (#312) HCA +2.4
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -19.4 More → 0.132 (#258) NetEff -19.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.3 | AdjD 69.8 More → 0.423 (#529) AdjO 66.3 | AdjD 69.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.525 (#300) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.488 (#310) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 159 | GP 31 More → 863 (#547) RD 159 | GP 31

2022 Schedule & Results

2022 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Ray'Sean Taylor Ray'Sean Taylor - 20 31.8 17.3 5.0 2.7 1.8 0.1 3.0 2.4 21.6 42 2.0 2.6 40.4 28.6 85.7 0.57 345.4 44.7
S. Doss Jr. S. Doss Jr. - 1 34.0 14.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 11.0 8.0 -52 -1.7 -2.2 45.5 0.0 80.0 1.07 53.0 45.5
C. Curtis C. Curtis - 1 24.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 7.0 - - - 37.5 20.0 66.7 -0.39 51.7 43.8
J. Pipkins J. Pipkins G 1 28.0 10.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 13.0 169 5.1 6.8 0 0 0 1.31 0 0
S. Wright S. Wright - 31 29.2 10.0 4.6 1.8 1.0 0.7 2.0 1.0 15.2 36 4.5 47.6 40.6 18.2 46.2 0.27 409.6 43.8
C. Carter C. Carter G 4 27.2 9.0 5.5 3.0 0.8 0.0 3.2 3.2 11.8 62 2.3 10.2 61.5 60.0 50.0 0.63 129.7 73.1
L. Wright L. Wright - 31 22.2 6.7 3.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.6 0.9 10.0 44 1.4 2.7 62.1 50.0 50.0 0.61 328.7 63.8
D. Pruitt D. Pruitt - 4 22.0 6.5 4.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 2.5 10.2 -81 -2.7 -4.1 40.0 33.3 75.0 -0.84 110.5 45.0
C. Williams C. Williams G 3 7.3 3.7 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.7 2.7 -43 -2.0 -6.0 60.0 50.0 0 1.18 110.0 70.0
Desmond Polk Desmond Polk - 27 17.0 3.3 2.2 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.6 -55 -2.0 -4.5 20.0 0.0 0 -0.61 890.0 20.0
J. Kurtas J. Kurtas - 31 11.4 2.1 2.2 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.4 4.7 -4 -0.1 -0.4 54.5 0 0.0 0.15 288.5 54.5
M. Howell M. Howell G 1 18.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 -56 -1.8 -3.5 0 0 0 0.3 0 0
M. Ekono M. Ekono G 1 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 14 1.0 10.8 0 0 0 0.24 0 0
M. Matas M. Matas - 2 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 16 1.1 9.3 0 0 50.0 0.24 56.8 0
C. Benford C. Benford F 1 6.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 -3 -0.1 -0.6 0 0 0 -0.61 0 0
R. Burger R. Burger - 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG