Sacramento Kings
Model Outputs
2001-2002
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1163 (#4) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1208 (#2) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +10.2 (#1) | HCA +3.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.811 (#1) | - |
2002 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-13 | @ | PHI | W | 92 - 88 |
| 2002-03-14 | @ | NYK | L | 96 - 113 |
| 2002-03-17 | @ | TOR | W | 116 - 113 |
| 2002-03-19 | vs | HOU | W | 110 - 87 |
| 2002-03-21 | vs | DEN | W | 118 - 82 |
| 2002-03-24 | vs | LAL | L | 96 - 97 |
| 2002-03-26 | vs | LAC | W | 107 - 90 |
| 2002-03-28 | @ | HOU | W | 101 - 74 |
| 2002-03-29 | @ | CHH | W | 92 - 87 |
| 2002-03-31 | @ | ATL | W | 92 - 91 |
| 2002-04-02 | @ | MEM | W | 107 - 83 |
| 2002-04-03 | @ | DET | W | 107 - 86 |
| 2002-04-05 | @ | UTA | W | 117 - 109 |
| 2002-04-07 | vs | NYK | W | 116 - 82 |
| 2002-04-09 | vs | MIN | W | 122 - 103 |
| 2002-04-10 | @ | GSW | W | 118 - 116 |
| 2002-04-12 | @ | LAC | W | 125 - 106 |
| 2002-04-14 | vs | DAL | L | 100 - 113 |
| 2002-04-16 | vs | GSW | W | 120 - 106 |
| 2002-04-17 | @ | LAL | L | 95 - 109 |
2002 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Webber | G | 17 | 37.9 | 25.6 | 9.9 | 5.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 19.4 | 22.5 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0.0 | 80.5 | - | 59.4 | 55.6 |
| Peja Stojakovic | G | 11 | 29.0 | 16.3 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 12.5 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 49.3 | 37.8 | 82.9 | - | 58.3 | 54.3 |
| Mike Bibby | G | 20 | 32.8 | 13.8 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 12.4 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 45.6 | 38.1 | 74.5 | - | 51.5 | 48.8 |
| Doug Christie | G | 20 | 34.9 | 12.3 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 8.7 | 13.9 | - | - | - | 49.7 | 36.4 | 87.9 | - | 62.2 | 56.6 |
| Bobby Jackson | G | 19 | 20.8 | 11.6 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 9.4 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 30.8 | 82.8 | - | 53.8 | 48.0 |
| Vlade Divac | G | 20 | 27.6 | 11.3 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 20.0 | 59.4 | - | 54.5 | 52.5 |
| Hedo Turkoglu | G | 18 | 26.8 | 10.9 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 9.3 | 8.6 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 33.3 | 72.4 | - | 50.6 | 45.8 |
| Scot Pollard | G | 20 | 20.8 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 54.3 | 0 | 81.2 | - | 61.2 | 54.3 |
| Lawrence Funderburke | G | 14 | 12.4 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 4.4 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 54.8 | 0.0 | 72.7 | - | 58.6 | 54.8 |
| Gerald Wallace | G | 17 | 11.8 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 0.0 | 46.7 | - | 42.7 | 41.9 |
| Mateen Cleaves | G | 10 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 48.4 | 40.0 | 100.0 | - | 52.5 | 51.6 |
| Brent Price | F | 1 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 30.7 | 25.0 |
| Chucky Brown | G | 14 | 5.4 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 36.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 36.7 | 36.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG