🐻⬇️🏀

Rutgers Scarlet

Also known as: Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Program History

2017 Team Stats (6 games)

57.2
PPG
69.0
Opp
-11.8
Margin
35.6%
FG%
36.6%
3P%
58.4%
FT%
35.5
RPG
8.0
APG
14.2
TO
80.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2016-2017
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1399 (#91) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1459 (#60) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +32.5 (#73) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.085 (#90) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -10.5 More → 0.230 (#90) AdjNet -10.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -10.4 More → 0.230 (#90) AdjNet -10.4

2017 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2016-12-27 @ Wisconsin Badgers L 52 - 72
2017-01-24 @ Maryland Terrapins L 55 - 67
2017-01-28 vs Wisconsin Badgers L 54 - 61
2017-02-14 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 55 - 74
2017-03-08 @ Ohio State Buckeyes W 66 - 57
2017-03-09 @ Northwestern Wildcats L 61 - 83

2017 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
N. Johnson N. Johnson G 6 30.0 17.2 3.7 1.0 1.3 0.0 1.3 13.2 8.7 41 1.5 3.1 41.8 57.6 78.3 1.13 57.8 53.8
C. Sanders C. Sanders G 6 30.7 10.2 2.2 2.8 0.7 0.5 3.0 14.0 -0.7 - - - 27.4 26.7 52.4 0.31 32.7 29.8
D. Freeman D. Freeman F 6 27.2 8.7 5.2 0.7 1.3 0.8 2.0 8.8 5.8 47 4.3 6.1 39.6 12.5 50.0 1.48 42.7 40.6
M. Williams M. Williams G 6 26.3 5.5 5.5 0.8 0.7 0.5 1.3 6.8 4.8 2 0.2 0.4 29.3 26.3 80.0 0.78 38.2 35.4
C.J. Gettys C.J. Gettys C 6 21.2 5.0 4.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 2.0 5.0 4.8 - - - 43.3 0 50.0 - 44.7 43.3
I. Thiam I. Thiam F 6 16.7 4.0 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 4.0 1.8 - - - 37.5 37.5 0 - 50.0 50.0
K. Batie K. Batie G 1 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
Eugene Omoruyi Eugene Omoruyi - 6 12.3 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 1.0 2.2 1.8 - - - 46.2 0.0 0 - 46.2 46.2
J. Laurent J. Laurent G 5 10.8 1.8 2.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.8 1.6 - - - 44.4 100.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
C. Sa C. Sa F 6 10.5 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.7 - - - 22.2 0.0 57.1 - 33.1 22.2
S. Doorson S. Doorson C 6 10.5 1.0 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 2.7 - - - 50.0 0 40.0 - 48.4 50.0
I. Diallo I. Diallo F 5 8.6 0.4 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.6 0.2 - - - 12.5 0 0.0 - 11.3 12.5
J. Dadika J. Dadika G 3 4.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG