Rutgers Scarlet
2011 Team Stats (10 games)
64.4
PPG
65.5
Opp
+0.9
Margin
41.3%
FG%
31.4%
3P%
70.7%
FT%
30.8
RPG
13.0
APG
11.1
TO
75.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1476 (#87) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1454 (#69) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +28.9 (#92) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.314 (#86) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.214 (#183) | NetEff -11.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.642 (#45) | AdjNet +5.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.643 (#45) | AdjNet +5.1 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Mitchell
|
F | 19 | 32.0 | 15.0 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 31.4 | 86.5 | - | 95.5 | 42.9 |
J. Beatty
|
G | 19 | 32.5 | 9.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 42.7 | 41.1 | 68.8 | - | 88.8 | 58.3 |
D. Miller
|
G-F | 19 | 31.4 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 13.7 | 37 | 37.0 | 337.6 | 37.5 | 27.3 | 56.0 | 0.43 | 84.6 | 39.1 |
G. Biruta
|
F | 19 | 22.1 | 9.1 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 51.7 | 0 | 77.5 | - | 111.5 | 51.7 |
M. Coburn
|
G | 19 | 33.8 | 8.5 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 21.1 | 65.6 | - | 80.4 | 44.2 |
M. Poole
|
F | 19 | 19.4 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 5.6 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 16.7 | 68.4 | - | 62.5 | 42.1 |
A. Johnson
|
F | 19 | 16.2 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 53.6 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 117.2 | 53.6 |
R. Lumpkins
|
F | 16 | 10.4 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 78.9 | 47.1 |
A. Carroll
|
C | 13 | 9.8 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 45.5 | 50.0 | - | 95.5 | 56.7 |
C. Rigoglioso
|
G | 4 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Kuhn
|
G | 3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
F. Mitchell
|
F | 3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG