Purdue
2013 Team Stats (24 games)
67.3
PPG
61.0
Opp
+6.3
Margin
42.5%
FG%
34.2%
3P%
76.5%
FT%
34.3
RPG
16.1
APG
17.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
70.3
Adj PPG
53.5
Adj Opp PPG
#29
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1417 (#20) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1307 (#22) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1105 (#51) | HCA +72 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +18.3 (#29) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +19.1 (#23) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.760 (#69) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.965 (#29) | AdjNet +28.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.967 (#29) | AdjNet +29.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.821 (#29) | AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 53.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.739 (#33) | AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 56.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.877 (#26) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.866 (#26) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1275 (#26) | RD 110 | GP 34 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Moses
|
G | 24 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 6.8 | 195 | 29 | 6.7 | 8.7 | 42.3 | 35.6 | 90.2 | 3.04 | 56.2 | 51.0 |
D. Mingo
|
F | 24 | 0.0 | 12.2 | 6.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 227 | 29 | 7.8 | 11.5 | 46.9 | 34.8 | 87.3 | 4.0 | 56.3 | 50.4 |
S. Ostarello
|
NA | 23 | 0.0 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 9.0 | 15.3 | 178 | 29 | 6.1 | 8.7 | 49.0 | 11.1 | 71.6 | 1.89 | 53.3 | 49.3 |
K. Houser
|
G | 24 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 10.1 | 7.5 | 203 | 29 | 7.0 | 9.5 | 34.7 | 32.5 | 72.3 | 3.57 | 46.7 | 42.6 |
C. Poston
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 25 | 21 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | -0.78 | 44.4 | 30.0 |
D. Williams
|
G | 21 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 136 | 29 | 4.7 | 8.0 | 36.4 | 40.0 | 73.7 | 0.75 | 45.7 | 41.6 |
C. Redmon
|
C | 1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -19 | 16 | -1.2 | -19.4 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -2.43 | 17.4 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG