Pomona-Pitzer
Season:
2026
Also known as: Pomona-Pitzer
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 955 (#398) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 977 (#307) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 973 (#517) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -25.7 (#631) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.008 (#634) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.204 (#525) | AdjNet -11.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.205 (#524) | AdjNet -11.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.281 (#573) | AdjO 66.3 | AdjD 76.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.386 (#541) | AdjO 61.0 | AdjD 66.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.160 (#624) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.218 (#594) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 886 (#395) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | vs | Cal Poly Pomona | L | 58 - 88 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Chicco | - | 1 | 16.9 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 50.0 | 71.4 | - | 70.4 | 66.7 |
| Avery Patricco | - | 1 | 22.1 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0.0 | 85.7 | - | 66.2 | 55.6 |
| Jadyn Lee | - | 1 | 12.8 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 54.6 | 41.7 |
| Molly Pieper | - | 1 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 30.7 | 25.0 |
| Emily Lee | - | 1 | 15.2 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Kellie Au | - | 1 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 150.0 |
| Ali Bennett | - | 1 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Sofia Robel | - | 1 | 13.1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Abigail Homan | - | 1 | 14.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Kayla Malek | - | 1 | 17.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Claire Wegmann-Krider | - | 1 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Shea Joko | - | 1 | 22.3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Anna Revill | - | 1 | 8.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Katie Drais | - | 1 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Elsa Cottrell | - | 1 | 17.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG