Pittsburgh Panthers
2023 Team Stats (6 games)
54.7
PPG
70.0
Opp
-15.3
Margin
35.5%
FG%
27.0%
3P%
69.8%
FT%
31.3
RPG
9.2
APG
14.8
TO
77.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 961 (#285) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1021 (#220) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.9 (#205) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.080 (#341) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | @ | DePaul Blue Demons | L | 59 - 74 |
| 2023-01-19 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 62 - 69 |
| 2023-01-26 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 57 - 72 |
| 2023-02-02 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 44 - 53 |
| 2023-02-09 | @ | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 63 - 69 |
| 2023-02-19 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 43 - 83 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Brown
|
F | 6 | 28.5 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 0 | 67.7 | - | 59.8 | 52.9 |
D. Harris
|
G | 6 | 20.3 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 43.9 | 16.7 | 75.0 | - | 52.0 | 46.3 |
L. King
|
- | 6 | 21.7 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 7.8 | 8.3 | - | - | - | 29.8 | 0 | 61.1 | - | 35.5 | 29.8 |
G. Hutcherson
|
G | 5 | 19.8 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 6.2 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 38.7 | 30.8 | 50.0 | - | 45.8 | 45.2 |
M. Johnson
|
G | 6 | 25.5 | 6.0 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 28.0 | 20.8 | 75.0 | - | 34.8 | 33.0 |
A. Strickland
|
G | 6 | 19.0 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 34.8 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
E. Hayford
|
G | 6 | 19.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 40.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 46.8 | 45.5 |
C. Lewis
|
G | 4 | 15.2 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 45.4 | 38.5 |
C. Ezeja
|
F | 4 | 9.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 53.8 | 44.4 |
D. Strother
|
G | 4 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 27.3 | 0 | - | 45.8 | 45.8 |
A. Malcolm
|
G | 5 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 36.4 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Washenitz
|
G | 6 | 16.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 3.5 | -0.8 | - | - | - | 19.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 22.9 | 19.0 |
T. Exanor
|
F | 5 | 8.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
S. Clesca
|
G | 3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG