Pitt.-Greensburg
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 794 (#472) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 645 (#595) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 686 (#729) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -31.1 (#397) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -45.8 (#710) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.058 (#663) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.017 (#549) | NetEff -27.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.004 (#691) | AdjNet -47.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.003 (#691) | AdjNet -48.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.057 (#693) | AdjO 49.5 | AdjD 80.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.045 (#724) | AdjO 40.5 | AdjD 74.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.017 (#717) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.017 (#720) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 510 (#578) | RD 104 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Kenyon | L | 44 - 56 |
| 2025-11-11 | @ | Saint Vincent | L | 47 - 67 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Penn St.-Beaver | L | 52 - 62 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Chatham | L | 58 - 97 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Grove City | L | 49 - 86 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Penn St.-Altoona | L | 39 - 64 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Alfred St. | L | 50 - 56 |
| 2025-12-15 | @ | Allegheny | L | 51 - 71 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Hood | L | 50 - 57 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Muskingum | L | 60 - 80 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Carlow | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Hilbert | L | 45 - 49 |
| 2026-01-19 | @ | Mount Aloysius | L | 43 - 87 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | La Roche | L | 41 - 87 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Alfred St. | L | 50 - 81 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Mount Aloysius | L | 42 - 70 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Penn St.-Behrend | L | 47 - 103 |
| 2026-02-02 | @ | Carlow | L | 53 - 55 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Hilbert | L | 49 - 54 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jocelyn Bielak | - | 18 | 38.9 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 7.4 | 14.0 | 3.7 | -326 | -18.1 | -61.2 | 36.5 | 24.1 | 71.2 | -2.17 | 43.7 | 40.3 |
| Autumn Matthews | - | 10 | 33.2 | 11.8 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 10.2 | 6.0 | -66 | -6.6 | -33.7 | 42.2 | 37.9 | 80.8 | 1.61 | 52.0 | 47.5 |
| Kaylee Charles | - | 4 | 22.3 | 10.8 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 9.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 51.0 | 50.0 |
| Trinity Lockwood-Morris | - | 1 | 34.4 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 5.0 | -6 | -6.0 | -5.0 | 25.0 | 28.6 | 100.0 | 0.12 | 38.8 | 33.3 |
| Addison Musto | - | 8 | 32.6 | 8.6 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 8.8 | 3.6 | -176 | -25.1 | -72.6 | 32.9 | 30.8 | 77.8 | -3.76 | 46.6 | 44.3 |
| Tiana Moracco | - | 5 | 35.6 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 5.2 | 9.0 | 5.6 | -25 | -6.2 | -13.1 | 20.0 | 4.8 | 82.1 | -1.81 | 36.6 | 21.1 |
| Abby Henise | - | 12 | 30.6 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 6.9 | 8.1 | -235 | -18.1 | -94.8 | 43.4 | 0.0 | 35.0 | -4.24 | 42.7 | 43.4 |
| Ca'Mari Walden | - | 17 | 28.1 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 8.6 | 0.6 | -206 | -11.4 | -62.3 | 28.1 | 7.1 | 52.0 | -2.15 | 30.9 | 28.8 |
| Anna Durbin | - | 7 | 28.2 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 2.7 | -49 | -6.1 | -25.1 | 32.6 | 30.4 | 83.3 | -0.39 | 43.8 | 40.7 |
| GiGi Finch | - | 5 | 31.2 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 9.4 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 76.2 | - | 57.8 | 40.0 |
| Hailey Bock | - | 6 | 21.3 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 1.7 | -46 | -7.7 | -54.4 | 34.5 | 0 | 57.1 | -1.88 | 37.4 | 34.5 |
| Kaprice Johnson | - | 10 | 14.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 4.6 | -0.4 | -166 | -15.1 | -113.0 | 21.7 | 11.8 | 57.1 | -2.79 | 28.8 | 23.9 |
| Laura Vittone | - | 7 | 28.5 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | -127 | -21.2 | -97.7 | 33.3 | 0 | 62.5 | 0.9 | 38.7 | 33.3 |
| Phoebe Snyder | - | 18 | 18.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | -0.3 | -280 | -15.6 | -87.9 | 25.0 | 16.7 | 75.0 | -2.68 | 28.7 | 26.2 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG