Penn St.-Scranton
Also known as: Penn St.-Scranton
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1019 (#304) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1029 (#253) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -36.3 (#688) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.797 (#313) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.877 (#183) | NetEff +15.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.002 (#711) | AdjNet -53.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.001 (#711) | AdjNet -57.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.051 (#703) | AdjO 47.0 | AdjD 79.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.322 (#590) | AdjO 53.5 | AdjD 61.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.174 (#615) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.182 (#618) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1030 (#277) | RD 234 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-29 | @ | Valley Forge | W | 63 - 36 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Koch | - | 1 | 33.7 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 18.0 | 15.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 60.9 | 58.3 |
| Anaja Jackson | - | 1 | 38.6 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 25.0 | 72 | 3.8 | 23.9 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 88.9 | 2.1 | 62.7 | 50.0 |
| Karma Paez | - | 1 | 28.7 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 40.6 | 31.8 |
| Inayah Muhammad | - | 1 | 38.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Tressie Bender | - | 1 | 38.1 | 4.0 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Vanessa Hodges | - | 1 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Emily Moyles | - | 1 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Brenda Olmedo | - | 1 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Aspen Isreal | - | 1 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG