Penn St.-Abington
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1073 (#99) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1056 (#230) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1146 (#58) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -6.2 (#256) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -5.3 (#434) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.817 (#296) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.840 (#200) | NetEff +11.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.182 (#496) | AdjNet -13.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.165 (#502) | AdjNet -13.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.331 (#484) | AdjO 66.4 | AdjD 74.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.625 (#204) | AdjO 66.4 | AdjD 60.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.559 (#330) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.583 (#307) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1138 (#115) | RD 104 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Muhlenberg | L | 75 - 81 |
| 2025-11-11 | @ | Washington Col. | L | 57 - 68 |
| 2025-11-13 | @ | Centenary (NJ) | W | 75 - 61 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Gallaudet | W | 78 - 55 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Salisbury | W | 49 - 43 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Hunter | L | 68 - 76 |
| 2025-12-01 | @ | Swarthmore | W | 66 - 58 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Penn College | L | 58 - 61 |
| 2025-12-09 | vs | Arcadia | W | 67 - 66 |
| 2025-12-12 | vs | Delaware Valley | W | 89 - 73 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Trinity (CT) | L | 42 - 57 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | St. Mary's (MD) | L | 44 - 98 |
| 2026-01-13 | vs | Manor | W | 108 - 42 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Cairn | W | 82 - 53 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Cedar Crest | W | 62 - 59 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Lancaster Bible | W | 64 - 55 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Notre Dame (MD) | W | 56 - 55 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Penn St.-Berks | W | 80 - 43 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Gallaudet | W | 91 - 33 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amirah Hackney | - | 19 | 29.6 | 16.7 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 17.4 | 7.4 | -15 | -0.8 | -4.0 | 37.2 | 23.9 | 54.8 | 3.77 | 43.8 | 42.0 |
| Nia Newman | - | 19 | 29.8 | 11.2 | 7.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 9.2 | 11.6 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.2 | 48.0 | 32.8 | 70.6 | 2.14 | 55.8 | 53.7 |
| Naila Newman | - | 19 | 35.3 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 43 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 39.9 | 21.1 | 61.5 | 1.09 | 46.0 | 42.1 |
| Amina Reid | - | 19 | 31.5 | 9.8 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 4.7 | 11.5 | 5.5 | -56 | -2.8 | -14.0 | 33.5 | 19.0 | 59.5 | -0.65 | 39.5 | 37.2 |
| Xenia Gillis | - | 11 | 25.3 | 9.8 | 9.4 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 13.3 | -55 | -4.6 | -44.7 | 51.2 | 25.0 | 75.8 | -3.59 | 57.1 | 51.9 |
| Layla Reid | - | 10 | 25.6 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 9.1 | 2.6 | -26 | -2.6 | -17.7 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 70.4 | -0.8 | 36.5 | 30.8 |
| Tarianda Washington | - | 18 | 18.9 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 6.3 | 7.8 | 52 | 2.6 | 13.1 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 45.5 | 4.02 | 42.7 | 41.2 |
| Hailey Revak | - | 13 | 11.1 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 5.2 | -0.9 | 78 | 5.2 | 44.3 | 22.1 | 22.2 | 0 | -0.56 | 32.4 | 32.4 |
| Tramiya Batts | - | 16 | 12.5 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 102 | 5.7 | 46.6 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 1.95 | 34.0 | 33.3 |
| Sereniti Minor | - | 12 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 0.5 | -14 | -1.0 | -11.0 | 23.1 | 0.0 | 38.5 | -4.7 | 25.7 | 23.1 |
| Gaziyah Fabian | - | 10 | 7.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 18.8 | 0.0 | 10.0 | - | 17.2 | 18.8 |
| Kylie Frey | - | 2 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | 14 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 8.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG