Penn St. Brandywine
Also known as: Penn St. Brandywine
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 848 (#458) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 726 (#570) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 814 (#677) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -37.4 (#407) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -32.4 (#676) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.038 (#679) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.021 (#544) | NetEff -23.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.003 (#702) | AdjNet -50.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.002 (#698) | AdjNet -51.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.056 (#697) | AdjO 45.4 | AdjD 76.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.132 (#694) | AdjO 47.2 | AdjD 68.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.048 (#697) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.054 (#696) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 737 (#519) | RD 101 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Neumann | L | 47 - 60 |
| 2025-11-10 | @ | Alvernia | L | 31 - 82 |
| 2025-11-13 | @ | Bryn Mawr | L | 50 - 58 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Penn St.-York | L | 39 - 56 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Swarthmore | L | 35 - 78 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Widener | L | 36 - 86 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Penn St. Harrisburg | L | 51 - 64 |
| 2025-12-02 | vs | Cheyney | L | 41 - 81 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Haverford | L | 43 - 66 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Cairn | W | 61 - 55 |
| 2026-01-13 | @ | Valley Forge | W | 64 - 42 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Notre Dame (MD) | L | 44 - 74 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Keystone | W | 63 - 44 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Wilmington (DE) | L | 51 - 75 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Wilson | L | 58 - 75 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Penn College | L | 37 - 57 |
| 2026-02-02 | @ | Penn St.-Berks | W | 70 - 44 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Penn St. Harrisburg | L | 53 - 70 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Cedar Crest | L | 49 - 74 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinell Watson | - | 17 | 24.7 | 9.7 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 11.6 | 2.0 | -86 | -6.6 | -32.6 | 28.4 | 12.5 | 67.6 | -0.2 | 35.9 | 29.2 |
| Ashley Robinson | - | 13 | 21.3 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 10.3 | 3.6 | -29 | -2.4 | -15.1 | 24.6 | 19.4 | 58.9 | -0.17 | 33.4 | 27.2 |
| Jazmyn Kemp | - | 19 | 23.8 | 6.5 | 8.7 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 7.9 | 9.2 | -133 | -7.4 | -48.9 | 28.5 | 0.0 | 45.1 | -3.46 | 32.9 | 28.5 |
| Tejanae Ballin | - | 9 | 22.1 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 5.1 | 4.4 | -52 | -5.8 | -82.6 | 39.1 | 40.0 | 50.0 | -0.43 | 45.4 | 43.5 |
| Analise Sierra | - | 19 | 24.0 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 2.5 | -85 | -5.7 | -47.4 | 24.8 | 18.3 | 62.1 | 0.59 | 33.0 | 29.2 |
| Taylor Mims | - | 11 | 17.2 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0.5 | -72 | -6.5 | -41.5 | 31.9 | 7.1 | 40.0 | -1.36 | 33.0 | 32.6 |
| Raelyn Loper | - | 16 | 19.9 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 1.9 | -95 | -6.8 | -99.8 | 28.8 | 0.0 | 78.4 | -3.05 | 39.8 | 28.8 |
| Journey Handy | - | 18 | 22.1 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 2.3 | -63 | -3.7 | -25.1 | 26.6 | 26.8 | 50.0 | -3.26 | 37.1 | 36.7 |
| Cassidy Tolbert | - | 19 | 19.2 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 2.9 | -39 | -2.3 | -22.0 | 34.1 | 5.9 | 80.0 | -0.4 | 37.2 | 34.6 |
| Caroline Messick | - | 7 | 11.8 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26.7 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 1.13 | 35.2 | 33.3 |
| Abigail Adorno | - | 17 | 19.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 0.1 | -44 | -2.9 | -17.1 | 16.7 | 10.5 | 61.5 | -0.46 | 25.1 | 19.0 |
| Rayne Manson | - | 13 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 0.5 | -67 | -5.6 | -58.7 | 34.2 | 16.7 | 21.4 | -0.65 | 34.0 | 35.5 |
| Destiny Johnson | - | 9 | 11.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 4.2 | -0.9 | -44 | -4.9 | -63.0 | 21.1 | 8.3 | 0.0 | -3.71 | 21.9 | 22.4 |
| Tahkya Pray | - | 8 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 8 | 2.0 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 60.0 | -0.2 | 54.9 | 50.0 |
| Lanna Chhim | - | 7 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -3 | -0.6 | -20.9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.08 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG