Pacific Lutheran Lutes
2024 Team Stats (1 games)
52.0
PPG
96.0
Opp
-44.0
Margin
33.3%
FG%
36.8%
3P%
81.3%
FT%
21.0
RPG
9.0
APG
14.0
TO
69.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 998 (#260) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.4 (#403) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.488 (#291) | AdjO 73.0 | AdjD 73.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.413 (#393) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.431 (#378) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 908 (#458) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | @ | Idaho Vandals | L | 52 - 96 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Montes
|
- | 1 | 20.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 83.8 | 75.0 |
B. Riedel
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 45.5 | 38.9 |
A. Rico
|
- | 1 | 28.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 59.2 | 50.0 |
S. Noland
|
- | 1 | 30.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 38.9 | 38.9 |
S. McGaughey-Fick
|
- | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
J. Barrett
|
- | 1 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 69.4 | 75.0 |
D. Plakinger
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 150.0 |
M. Nash
|
- | 1 | 25.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | -7.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 10.1 | 0.0 |
J. Williams
|
- | 1 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | -93 | -11.6 | -20.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.64 | 17.4 | 0.0 |
M. Hepper
|
- | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N. Tor
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
H. Smith
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S. Burton
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P. Peterson
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Kraft
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG