Portland Fire
Also known as: Portland Fire
Program History
2002 Team Stats (18 games)
66.8
PPG
68.2
Opp
-1.4
Margin
41.1%
FG%
31.8%
3P%
74.1%
FT%
30.4
RPG
14.7
APG
-
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.0
Adj PPG
67.6
Adj Opp PPG
#9
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2002
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1009 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1014 (#7) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 993 (#10) | HCA +77 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -0.6 (#9) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -0.7 (#9) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.458 (#9) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.486 (#9) | AdjNet -0.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.485 (#9) | AdjNet -0.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.487 (#9) | AdjO 67.0 | AdjD 67.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.484 (#9) | AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 68.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.490 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.490 (#10) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1031 (#6) | RD 110 | GP 32 |
2002 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-05-29 | vs | New York Liberty | L | 62 - 84 |
| 2002-05-30 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 64 - 69 |
| 2002-06-02 | vs | Seattle Storm | L | 47 - 57 |
| 2002-06-03 | @ | Los Angeles Sparks | L | 72 - 89 |
| 2002-06-06 | vs | Sacramento Monarchs | W | 86 - 73 |
| 2002-06-11 | @ | Seattle Storm | W | 70 - 63 |
| 2002-06-13 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | L | 46 - 60 |
| 2002-06-15 | vs | Dallas Wings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2002-06-18 | vs | Minnesota Lynx | W | 59 - 51 |
| 2002-06-20 | vs | Indiana Fever | L | 72 - 81 |
| 2002-06-23 | vs | Houston Comets | L | 58 - 71 |
| 2002-06-25 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 83 - 86 |
| 2002-06-26 | vs | Connecticut Sun | W | 64 - 57 |
| 2002-06-28 | vs | Washington Mystics | W | 72 - 66 |
| 2002-06-30 | @ | New York Liberty | W | 54 - 44 |
| 2002-07-02 | @ | Cleveland Rockers | W | 68 - 64 |
| 2002-07-03 | @ | Charlotte | - | Incomplete score |
| 2002-07-07 | vs | Sacramento Monarchs | W | 74 - 59 |
| 2002-07-10 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | W | 75 - 72 |
| 2002-07-12 | vs | Los Angeles Sparks | L | 76 - 82 |
2002 Roster
Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeMya Walker | F | 17 | 25.6 | 10.7 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | - | 8.8 | - | 58 | 31 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 46.7 | 28.6 | 61.5 | 0.73 | 51.0 | 47.3 |
| Ukari Figgs | G | 17 | 29.9 | 9.9 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | - | 7.9 | - | -5 | 31 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 37.8 | 36.6 | 95.2 | -0.71 | 54.7 | 47.4 |
| Sylvia Crawley | C | 18 | 24.3 | 9.1 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | - | 8.8 | - | 38 | 32 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 41.1 | 42.9 | 71.4 | -0.05 | 46.2 | 42.1 |
| Tamicha Jackson | G | 18 | 22.3 | 8.6 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.0 | - | 8.3 | - | 39 | 32 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 39.3 | 29.4 | 81.8 | 0.56 | 47.1 | 42.7 |
| Alisa Burras | F | 18 | 17.5 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | 4.9 | - | 11 | 32 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 63.6 | 0 | 74.1 | -0.48 | 66.1 | 63.6 |
| Jackie Stiles | G | 8 | 21.1 | 6.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | 7.2 | - | 85 | 21 | 4.0 | 7.9 | 25.9 | 31.2 | 81.8 | 1.68 | 39.2 | 30.2 |
| LaQuanda Quick | F | 15 | 17.3 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | - | 6.2 | - | 61 | 17 | 3.6 | 8.0 | 35.5 | 20.0 | 87.5 | 0.1 | 43.9 | 37.6 |
| Kristin Folkl | F | 18 | 20.6 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | - | 4.1 | - | 41 | 32 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 52.7 | 0.0 | 86.4 | 0.49 | 58.0 | 52.7 |
| Stacey Thomas | G | 18 | 19.1 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | - | 4.8 | - | 45 | 32 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 30.2 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 0.29 | 36.4 | 33.7 |
| Carolyn Young | - | 10 | 11.0 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | 4.0 | - | -8 | 19 | -0.4 | -1.2 | 22.5 | 33.3 | 87.5 | 0.12 | 33.3 | 27.5 |
| Tully Bevilaqua | G | 14 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | - | 1.9 | - | -16 | 27 | -0.6 | -2.1 | 40.7 | 38.9 | 69.2 | -0.11 | 58.1 | 53.7 |
| Amber Hall | - | 12 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | - | 1.5 | - | 42 | 20 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 50.0 | 0 | 40.0 | 0.51 | 49.1 | 50.0 |
| Jenny Mowe | - | 4 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 56.8 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2002 Shot Zones
1827 located field-goal attempts in 30 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
DeMya Chakheia WalkerTamicha JacksonSylvia CrawleyUkari FiggsStacey ThomasJackie Marie StilesTully Bevilaqua
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 348-620 | 56.1 | 696 | DeMya Chakheia Walker 26% (180 pts) | Alisa Burras 26% (178 pts) | DeMya Chakheia Walker 23% (62 misses) | Alisa Burras 15% (40 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 151-440 | 34.3 | 302 | Sylvia Crawley 26% (80 pts) | DeMya Chakheia Walker 19% (56 pts) | Sylvia Crawley 24% (68 misses) | DeMya Chakheia Walker 18% (52 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 57-146 | 39.0 | 114 | Tamicha Jackson 26% (30 pts) | Sylvia Crawley 23% (26 pts) | Sylvia Crawley 21% (19 misses) | Tamicha Jackson 20% (18 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 23-72 | 31.9 | 46 | Sylvia Crawley 22% (10 pts) | Tamicha Jackson 22% (10 pts) | Tamicha Jackson 31% (15 misses) | Sylvia Crawley 24% (12 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 72-203 | 35.5 | 144 | Tamicha Jackson 31% (44 pts) | Sylvia Crawley 29% (42 pts) | Sylvia Crawley 26% (34 misses) | Tamicha Jackson 18% (24 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 5-13 | 38.5 | 15 | Jackie Marie Stiles 40% (6 pts) | Ukari Figgs 40% (6 pts) | Stacey Thomas 50% (4 misses) | Jackie Marie Stiles 12% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 12-33 | 36.4 | 36 | Tully Bevilaqua 42% (15 pts) | Jackie Marie Stiles 17% (6 pts) | Ukari Figgs 43% (9 misses) | Tully Bevilaqua 19% (4 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 28-85 | 32.9 | 84 | Ukari Figgs 43% (36 pts) | Carolyn Young 11% (9 pts) | Ukari Figgs 26% (15 misses) | Tamicha Jackson 21% (12 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 25-74 | 33.8 | 75 | Sylvia Crawley 28% (21 pts) | Ukari Figgs 24% (18 pts) | Tamicha Jackson 22% (11 misses) | Ukari Figgs 18% (9 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 49-141 | 34.8 | 147 | Ukari Figgs 35% (51 pts) | Tamicha Jackson 24% (36 pts) | Ukari Figgs 35% (32 misses) | Tamicha Jackson 24% (22 misses) |