Our Lady of the Lake Saints
2025 Team Stats (1 games)
54.0
PPG
90.5
Opp
-29.0
Margin
33.3%
FG%
35.3%
3P%
88.9%
FT%
29.0
RPG
16.0
APG
21.0
TO
85.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 996 (#390) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -17.4 (#576) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.453 (#484) | AdjO 71.9 | AdjD 73.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.197 (#577) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.239 (#576) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 925 (#394) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-30 | @ | Lamar Cardinals | L | 54 - 88 |
| 2024-12-15 | @ | Incarnate Word Cardinals | L | 69 - 93 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Celestin
|
- | 2 | 23.0 | 10.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 83.3 | - | 46.4 | 40.0 |
T. Law
|
- | 2 | 24.0 | 9.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 66.7 | 50.0 | - | 53.1 | 52.9 |
T. Dennis
|
- | 2 | 13.5 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 6.5 | - | - | - | 62.5 | 66.7 | 0.0 | - | 82.9 | 87.5 |
L. Rand
|
- | 2 | 19.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 15.4 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 39.3 | 19.2 |
W. Lopez
|
- | 1 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 36.3 | 33.3 |
M. Gonzalez
|
- | 2 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 42.9 | 0 | - | 64.3 | 64.3 |
K. Elliott
|
- | 2 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 25 | 8.3 | 17.3 | 21.4 | 20.0 | 100.0 | -0.3 | 30.2 | 25.0 |
R. Gil
|
- | 2 | 19.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 44.4 | 44.4 |
B. Powell
|
- | 2 | 26.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 42.7 | 16.7 |
O. Cocic
|
- | 2 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 121.5 | 125.0 |
X. Purnell
|
- | 2 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 57.7 | 33.3 |
M. Odia
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
D. Cruz
|
- | 2 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
D. Durst
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG