Okla. Baptist
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 942 (#422) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1036 (#218) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1013 (#296) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +12.6 (#68) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +12.4 (#182) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.581 (#329) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.505 (#276) | NetEff +0.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.905 (#199) | AdjNet +19.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.915 (#199) | AdjNet +20.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.770 (#197) | AdjO 72.7 | AdjD 59.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.574 (#207) | AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 63.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.680 (#197) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.662 (#219) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1115 (#103) | RD 150 | GP 5 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Southern Nazarene | W | 81 - 73 |
| 2026-01-30 | vs | Southern Ark. | W | 82 - 57 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Ark.-Monticello | W | 65 - 60 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Harding | L | 40 - 69 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Arkansas Tech | L | 75 - 80 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaedyn Getman | - | 5 | 32.3 | 18.4 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 14.4 | 13.8 | -29 | -1.4 | -4.4 | 45.8 | 42.9 | 85.2 | -0.98 | 54.8 | 47.9 |
| Katelyn Davis | - | 5 | 34.6 | 15.2 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 10.8 | 8.8 | 19 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 53.7 | 42.9 | 60.0 | 0.94 | 65.1 | 64.8 |
| Jordyn Anderson | - | 5 | 33.2 | 12.0 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 9.2 | 7.4 | 51 | 2.4 | 8.2 | 45.7 | 0 | 72.0 | 2.9 | 52.6 | 45.7 |
| Brenna Butler | - | 5 | 29.3 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 6.6 | 10.0 | 68 | 3.2 | 10.7 | 42.4 | 27.3 | 85.7 | -0.55 | 54.9 | 47.0 |
| Parker Stevenson | - | 5 | 16.8 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 3.2 | -77 | -3.9 | -21.2 | 33.3 | 30.0 | 88.9 | -2.72 | 45.6 | 38.3 |
| Reagan Fox | - | 5 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 2.4 | -60 | -2.9 | -16.5 | 20.0 | 23.1 | 50.0 | 0.81 | 29.9 | 27.5 |
| Sydney Duncan | - | 5 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 3.0 | -31 | -1.7 | -14.9 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 71.4 | 1.57 | 39.8 | 29.2 |
| Sarah Davison | - | 2 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.24 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Faith Wright | - | 5 | 15.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 41 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 62.5 | 0.04 | 18.9 | 6.7 |
| Brianna Jones | - | 5 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 | -69 | -3.5 | -32.5 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.05 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
| Taryn Cottrell | - | 4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | -0.8 | -31 | -2.6 | -69.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.53 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG