Notre Dame
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1161 (#164) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1278 (#110) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.5 (#83) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.642 (#35) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.747 (#26) | AdjNet +9.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.750 (#26) | AdjNet +9.5 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Wesley
|
- | 24 | 29.3 | 14.1 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 15.0 | - | - | - | 39.8 | 21.2 | 63.9 | - | 126.6 | 42.8 |
Dane Goodwin
|
- | 31 | 33.2 | 13.2 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 16.2 | 7 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 53.9 | 61.5 | 69.2 | -0.03 | 249.6 | 64.5 |
P. Atkinson
|
F | 21 | 28.6 | 12.4 | 6.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 17.1 | - | - | - | 56.0 | 0 | 68.8 | - | 159.1 | 56.0 |
N. Laszewski
|
- | 30 | 28.5 | 9.4 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 14.5 | - | - | - | 51.6 | 35.9 | 85.7 | - | 206.1 | 62.9 |
C. Ryan
|
- | 24 | 29.7 | 9.3 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 12.6 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 42.9 | 68.8 | - | 134.9 | 64.5 |
P. Hubb
|
G | 24 | 33.8 | 8.8 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 11.7 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 21.6 | 84.6 | - | 126.6 | 35.9 |
N. Bohannon
|
F | 2 | 24.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 13.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 189.0 | 33.3 |
T. Wertz
|
- | 21 | 19.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 366.2 | 31.8 |
Elijah Taylor
|
F | 3 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 133.3 | 100.0 |
S. Faramade
|
C | 1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J.R. Konieczny
|
- | 4 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 35 | 3.9 | 5.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1.14 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
T. Sanders Jr.
|
- | 6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 58 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 1.71 | 300.0 | 150.0 |
Matt Zona
|
F | 6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 284.1 | 0 |
P. Fox
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
E. Morgan
|
- | 4 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Kimble
|
- | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG