Notre Dame
2021 Team Stats (3 games)
63.0
PPG
77.0
Opp
-10.6
Margin
37.7%
FG%
26.2%
3P%
78.3%
FT%
33.0
RPG
10.3
APG
9.7
TO
74.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1184 (#158) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1321 (#94) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.0 (#86) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.153 (#87) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.136 (#63) | NetEff -16.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.210 (#88) | AdjNet -11.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.209 (#88) | AdjNet -11.5 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-28 | @ | Michigan State Spartans | L | 70 - 80 |
| 2020-12-04 | vs | Tennessee Volunteers | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-30 | vs | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 57 - 66 |
| 2021-01-10 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 63 - 77 |
| 2021-01-13 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 68 - 80 |
| 2021-01-27 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2021-03-06 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | W | 83 - 73 |
| 2021-03-09 | vs | Wake Forest Demon Deacons | W | 80 - 77 |
| 2021-03-10 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 59 - 101 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. Hubb
|
G | 8 | 35.5 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 14.1 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 32.7 | 27.1 | 81.2 | - | 45.6 | 39.8 |
N. Laszewski
|
- | 8 | 30.9 | 12.8 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 55.8 | 31.6 | 76.0 | - | 68.9 | 61.5 |
C. Ryan
|
- | 7 | 29.1 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 8.9 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 35.5 | 31.4 | 78.9 | - | 49.7 | 44.4 |
J. Durham
|
F | 8 | 24.5 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 11.1 | - | - | - | 54.4 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 58.5 | 54.4 |
Dane Goodwin
|
- | 8 | 31.9 | 8.5 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 8.2 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 23.3 | 89.5 | 0.21 | 45.7 | 38.6 |
N. Djogo
|
G | 8 | 21.9 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 33.3 | 84.6 | - | 70.8 | 63.2 |
T. Wertz
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | -5.0 | - | - | - | 11.1 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
T. Sanders Jr.
|
- | 5 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 58 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 42.9 | 66.7 | 0 | 0.98 | 57.1 | 57.1 |
E. Morgan
|
- | 5 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 38.8 | 33.3 |
Matt Zona
|
F | 5 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 21.8 | 16.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG