Model Predictions
| Model | Tennessee Volunteers | Notre Dame F... | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 78.1% (#32) | 21.9% (#158) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 73.1% (#9) | 26.9% (#94) | - |
| Margin | 85.0% (#6) | 15.0% (#86) | Tenness... -9.5 |
| Pythagorean | 76.6% (#28) | 23.4% (#87) | - |
| Efficiency | 88.4% (#35) | 11.6% (#63) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 90.0% (#39) | 10.0% (#88) | - |
| Log Adjusted | 90.0% (#39) | 10.0% (#88) | - |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Tennessee Volunteers | Notre Dame F... |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 24 | 3 |
| PPG | 71.5 | 63.0 |
| FG% | 43.1% | 37.7% |
| 3PT% | 33.2% | 26.2% |
| FT% | 73.9% | 78.3% |
| RPG | 35.9 | 33.0 |
| APG | 14.7 | 10.3 |
| SPG | 7.3 | 4.0 |
| BPG | 5.0 | 4.3 |
| TOPG | 12.5 | 9.7 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Tennessee Volunteers | Notre Dame F... |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 102.9 | 94.2 |
| Adj. Def Eff | 97.1 | 105.8 |
| Adj. Net Eff | 5.8 | -11.5 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Tennessee Volunteers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y. Pons | 8.7 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 29.2 |
| S. Vescovi | 8.9 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 29.1 |
| J. James | 7.9 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 27.0 |
| J. Springer | 13.0 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 26.4 |
| J. Fulkerson | 9.2 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 25.8 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Hubb | 14.5 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 35.5 |
| D. Goodwin | 8.5 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 31.9 |
| N. Laszewski | 12.8 | 6.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 30.9 |
| C. Ryan | 10.0 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 29.1 |
| J. Durham | 9.6 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 24.5 |