🐻⬇️🏀

Northwestern Okla.

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2017 2016
Also known as: Northwestern Okla.
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1137 (#66) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1257 (#17) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1069 (#107) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +23.7 (#9) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +20.5 (#84) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.875 (#197) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +24.9 More → 0.964 (#99) NetEff +24.9
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -69.4 More → 0.000 (#510) NetEff -69.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +27.1 More → 0.958 (#143) AdjNet +27.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +27.8 More → 0.964 (#140) AdjNet +27.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 73.5 | AdjD 55.3 More → 0.839 (#135) AdjO 73.5 | AdjD 55.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 55.5 More → 0.743 (#55) AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 55.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.867 (#51) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.849 (#51) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 104 | GP 21 More → 1201 (#45) RD 104 | GP 21

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-14 @ Minn. Duluth W 67 - 57
2025-11-15 @ Winona St. W 53 - 52
2025-11-20 vs Pittsburg St. L 64 - 68
2025-11-22 vs Hesston W 108 - 17
2025-11-25 vs Cameron W 83 - 56
2025-11-29 vs Okla. Panhandle W 104 - 46
2025-12-04 @ Arkansas Tech W 72 - 66
2025-12-06 @ Harding W 65 - 57
2025-12-13 vs East Central W 74 - 56
2026-01-03 @ Okla. Baptist W 76 - 49
2026-01-10 vs Henderson St. W 68 - 47
2026-01-15 @ Ark.-Monticello W 77 - 62
2026-01-17 @ Southern Ark. L 51 - 58
2026-01-22 vs Southwestern Okla. W 69 - 56
2026-01-29 vs Harding L 51 - 58
2026-01-31 vs Arkansas Tech L 85 - 86
2026-02-05 @ Henderson St. W 73 - 59
2026-02-07 @ Ouachita Baptist L 62 - 75

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kira Bass - 18 30.3 19.2 9.5 1.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 14.4 17.2 127 6.0 23.0 47.3 0.0 84.7 1.52 55.5 47.3
Jaida Shipp - 17 17.6 9.2 4.9 1.2 0.8 0.3 1.6 8.0 6.7 128 6.4 38.8 48.5 0 77.4 -1.22 52.1 48.5
Conley Cayot - 18 32.1 9.2 4.1 2.5 1.7 0.4 2.8 8.7 6.4 129 6.1 28.3 41.0 41.5 76.9 0.23 49.3 46.5
Kennedy Hight - 9 26.9 8.6 2.6 1.7 1.4 0.2 1.8 8.1 4.6 -2 -0.2 -0.7 32.9 32.7 66.7 -1.14 47.6 44.5
Catyn Graham - 18 30.2 8.3 2.4 1.4 0.8 0.1 1.1 7.5 4.5 -25 -1.2 -4.7 34.8 36.0 88.2 2.69 52.6 50.0
Summya Adigun - 18 29.2 8.1 5.5 2.2 1.6 0.3 2.0 6.4 9.3 102 4.9 19.9 40.0 34.1 90.7 0.72 54.1 46.1
Isabella Pehrson - 1 18.5 7.0 5.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 8.0 0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 0.09 54.3 50.0
Camille Pritchard - 17 18.7 6.5 4.7 1.2 0.4 0.2 1.0 5.0 7.0 84 4.0 35.0 44.7 37.5 81.6 -2.52 54.1 46.5
Jamie Molina - 6 8.4 3.7 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.2 1.2 4.8 1.0 58 9.7 1784.6 24.1 24.0 66.7 -0.04 36.3 34.5
Madison Denison - 18 15.9 3.5 4.6 1.1 0.5 0.3 1.6 2.9 5.4 137 6.8 72.7 44.2 33.3 72.7 0.43 51.1 45.2
Keely Hussey - 5 7.1 2.8 0.6 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.8 2.8 - - - 55.6 57.1 0 - 77.8 77.8
Carson Schanbacher - 5 5.5 1.6 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.4 1.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 50.0 - 29.1 25.0
Anna Eldridge - 6 4.8 1.5 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.2 1.7 - - - 57.1 50.0 0 - 64.3 64.3
Ella Porter - 14 6.9 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.7 50 2.9 129.4 52.9 0.0 33.3 -1.41 50.9 52.9
EmmaJo Locks - 8 4.7 1.0 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.1 1.1 1.2 0.6 73 7.3 232.1 40.0 0 0.0 -1.15 36.8 40.0
Mattie Rich - 3 3.1 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 -0.7 - - - 20.0 0.0 0 - 20.0 20.0
Lily Mahy - 1 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 4.0 27.0 0 0 0 0.76 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG