Northwest Mo. St.
Season:
2026
Also known as: Northwest Mo. St.
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1057 (#228) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1020 (#290) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +13.8 (#174) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.984 (#160) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.800 (#273) | AdjNet +12.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.794 (#276) | AdjNet +11.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.711 (#230) | AdjO 73.6 | AdjD 63.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.725 (#103) | AdjO 71.2 | AdjD 60.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.717 (#199) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.709 (#201) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1083 (#200) | RD 298 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | vs | Buena Vista | W | 90 - 63 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bailey Birmingham | - | 1 | 28.3 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 19.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 71.4 | 100.0 | - | 88.3 | 83.3 |
| Andrea Lopreato | - | 1 | 27.6 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 13.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 57.6 | 53.8 |
| Avery Yosten | - | 1 | 21.0 | 16.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 25.0 | 25.0 | - | 58.1 | 62.5 |
| Sadie Maas | - | 1 | 21.7 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 15.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 63.5 | 57.1 |
| Boston Wand | - | 1 | 22.5 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 45.5 | 44.4 |
| Brooklyn Stanley | - | 1 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Maggie Collins | - | 1 | 17.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 13.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 69.4 | 66.7 |
| Kirsten Hauck | - | 1 | 26.6 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 38.1 | 35.7 |
| Reese Pasternik | - | 1 | 13.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG