North Texas
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1048 (#175) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 995 (#311) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +21.8 (#49) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.996 (#35) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.988 (#25) | AdjNet +38.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.989 (#25) | AdjNet +38.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.919 (#36) | AdjO 85.4 | AdjD 58.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.595 (#156) | AdjO 76.9 | AdjD 72.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.820 (#55) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.782 (#73) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1080 (#150) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-03 | vs | N.M. Highlands | W | 88 - 54 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Je'Shawn Stevenson | - | 1 | 20.4 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 40.0 | 66.7 | - | 71.2 | 70.0 |
| Josiah Shackleford | - | 1 | 15.5 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 85.7 | 0 | 57.1 | - | 79.4 | 85.7 |
| EJ Horton | - | 1 | 19.1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 123.0 | 125.0 |
| Will McClendon | - | 1 | 21.0 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 66.7 | 83.3 | - | 72.0 | 60.0 |
| Demarion Watson | - | 1 | 20.2 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 200 | 11.1 | 73.1 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 1.26 | 50.7 | 56.2 |
| David Terrell Jr. | - | 1 | 23.4 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 26 | 2.0 | 28.4 | 33.3 | 0 | 83.3 | 1.74 | 62.1 | 33.3 |
| Dylan Arnett | - | 1 | 23.9 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 64.7 | 100.0 |
| Cole Franklin | - | 1 | 16.8 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 37 | 1.8 | 51.4 | 40.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.27 | 36.8 | 40.0 |
| Cahmai Crosby | - | 1 | 16.6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Curtis Stinson Jr. | - | 1 | 16.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 15 | 1.7 | 378.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 1.12 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Reece Robinson | - | 1 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG