Nebraska
2012 Team Stats (7 games)
47.1
PPG
67.9
Opp
-20.7
Margin
33.4%
FG%
23.2%
3P%
77.1%
FT%
27.7
RPG
9.4
APG
14.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
62.2
Adj PPG
59.8
Adj Opp PPG
#131
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1055 (#143) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1043 (#142) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 933 (#261) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +3.1 (#128) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +1.5 (#152) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.319 (#254) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.640 (#129) | AdjNet +5.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.642 (#129) | AdjNet +5.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.554 (#131) | AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 59.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.454 (#215) | AdjO 60.8 | AdjD 62.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.524 (#158) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.504 (#163) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1040 (#145) | RD 137 | GP 28 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bo Spencer
|
G | 28 | 32.4 | 15.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 15.8 | -44 | 27 | -1.6 | -2.2 | 33.9 | 22.4 | 88.6 | 3.04 | 161.2 | 39.4 |
Toney McCray
|
G | 28 | 27.0 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 11.1 | -79 | 27 | -2.9 | -4.8 | 37.4 | 31.1 | 55.0 | 1.05 | 126.2 | 44.4 |
J. Diaz
|
C | 15 | 27.9 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 13.1 | 45 | 14 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 44.0 | 0 | 80.0 | 2.66 | 227.9 | 44.0 |
Dylan Talley
|
G | 23 | 23.5 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 11.6 | -28 | 22 | -1.3 | -2.4 | 39.5 | 36.8 | 87.5 | 1.42 | 196.8 | 47.7 |
Brandon Richardson
|
G | 28 | 30.8 | 7.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 11.4 | -120 | 27 | -4.4 | -6.3 | 44.6 | 40.9 | 75.7 | -1.66 | 137.0 | 52.7 |
Brandon Ubel
|
F | 28 | 28.3 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 11.4 | -93 | 27 | -3.4 | -5.4 | 53.1 | 14.3 | 71.4 | -0.63 | 174.0 | 54.1 |
Caleb Walker
|
G | 28 | 25.6 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 9.5 | -85 | 27 | -3.1 | -5.6 | 36.7 | 16.7 | 50.0 | -1.06 | 168.6 | 40.8 |
Josiah Moore
|
F | 14 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.9 | -17 | 15 | -1.1 | -6.8 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.88 | 119.5 | 60.0 |
Mike Fox
|
G | 20 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | -36 | 20 | -1.8 | -7.8 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -1.41 | 108.7 | 37.5 |
David Rivers
|
F | 18 | 8.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.7 | -28 | 19 | -1.5 | -7.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3.19 | 105.9 | 0.0 |
Corey Hilliard
|
G | 9 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | -34 | 10 | -3.4 | -31.4 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -3.71 | 92.2 | 25.0 |
Jordan Tyrance
|
F | 2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.79 | 0 | 0 |
Christopher Niemann
|
C | 22 | 5.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | -36 | 22 | -1.6 | -12.2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.92 | 75.0 | 0.0 |
Kye Kurkowski
|
F | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Trevor Menke
|
G | 3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.11 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG