🐻⬇️🏀

NVU-Lyndon Hornets

Season: 2026 2024 2023 2015 2013 2012 2011 2010
Also known as: NVU-Lyndon Hornets
Program History

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 975 (#506) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 975 (#568) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 997 (#288) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → -19.5 (#906) HCA +3.0
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → -36.5 (#1093) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -24.4 (#566) HCA +3.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.2 | AdjD 66.5 More → 0.448 (#436) AdjO 64.2 | AdjD 66.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.115 (#569) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.161 (#566) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 931 (#304) RD 350 | GP 1

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-27 @ NJIT Highlanders L 42 - 98

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Gray J. Gray F 1 31.0 12.0 8.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 22.0 -54 -2.2 -3.9 0 0 0 -0.2 0 0
D. Baranauskas D. Baranauskas - 1 28.0 11.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 10.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
J. Fortunato J. Fortunato G 1 29.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
H. Lyles H. Lyles - 1 26.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 7.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
D. Lorden D. Lorden - 1 20.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG