🐻⬇️🏀

N.C. Central

Season: 2026 2024 2023 2022 2021 2018 2017 2016
Also known as: N.C. Central
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1061 (#219) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1068 (#139) HCA +62 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1044 (#196) HCA +62 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +47.5 (#31) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +10.7 (#203) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 1.000 (#106) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +65.7 More → 1.000 (#39) NetEff +65.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +44.2 More → 0.994 (#97) AdjNet +44.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +43.4 More → 0.995 (#98) AdjNet +43.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 90.8 | AdjD 55.8 More → 0.960 (#70) AdjO 90.8 | AdjD 55.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 87.7 | AdjD 57.7 More → 0.938 (#5) AdjO 87.7 | AdjD 57.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 59.3 More → 0.677 (#144) AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 59.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.938 (#34) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.662 (#250) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.938 (#28) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.675 (#239) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 105 | GP 21 More → 1077 (#213) RD 105 | GP 21

2024 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2023-11-19 vs JWU (Charlotte) W 83 - 50
2024-01-16 vs N.C. Wesleyan W 110 - 42

2024 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kimeira Burks - 1 34.0 25.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 17.0 14.0 - - - 41.2 41.7 100.0 - 63.6 55.9
Kimia Carter - 1 16.0 17.0 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 9.0 14.0 - - - 66.7 66.7 33.3 - 82.4 88.9
Morgan Callahan - 2 29.0 16.5 12.5 5.0 1.5 0.5 3.5 13.0 19.5 - - - 57.7 0 75.0 0.39 59.4 57.7
Sydney Avoletta - 1 18.0 16.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 10.0 19.0 - - - 70.0 0 33.3 - 63.3 70.0
Kyla Bryant - 2 27.5 14.5 5.5 1.5 3.0 0.5 3.5 13.0 8.5 61 5.5 10.9 50.0 11.1 40.0 0.44 51.4 51.9
Janiah Jones - 2 22.5 11.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 9.5 9.0 88 14.7 16.2 47.4 12.5 100.0 0.78 55.4 50.0
Aniya Finger - 1 9.0 11.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 - - - 71.4 0 100.0 - 73.9 71.4
Jada Tiggett - 2 18.5 8.0 4.5 0.5 1.0 3.0 2.5 7.0 7.5 - - - 42.9 0.0 100.0 - 50.8 42.9
Nijah Cunningham - 1 21.0 8.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 9.0 3.0 - - - 44.4 0 0 - 44.4 44.4
Ray'ven Robinson - 2 21.5 5.0 5.0 7.0 1.5 0.5 3.0 6.5 9.5 54 5.4 16.2 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.08 34.9 38.5
Tippy Robertson - 2 31.0 2.5 6.0 8.5 2.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 12.0 - - - 25.0 33.3 0 - 31.2 31.2
Taylor Williams - 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -22 -1.6 -2.1 0 0 0 0.3 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG