Morris
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 904 (#437) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 986 (#367) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -21.9 (#309) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -10.8 (#465) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.007 (#662) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.008 (#746) | AdjNet -41.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.008 (#744) | AdjNet -40.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.039 (#754) | AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 104.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.456 (#386) | AdjO 75.5 | AdjD 77.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.320 (#445) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.344 (#434) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 880 (#383) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Johnson C. Smith | L | 80 - 97 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kashannon Strobert | - | 1 | 28.3 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 16.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 50.7 | 46.9 |
| Tourran Warner | - | 1 | 33.8 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 80.0 | 80.0 |
| Da'Shawn Smith | - | 1 | 24.1 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 18.0 | 55 | 3.1 | 13.3 | 75.0 | 0 | 37.5 | 1.42 | 65.1 | 75.0 |
| Jayden Bolden | - | 1 | 13.1 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 71.7 | 75.0 |
| Khail Baker | - | 1 | 15.4 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | -62 | -3.1 | -17.0 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | -0.14 | 29.6 | 30.0 |
| Tyler Dubose | - | 1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Kentrell Suggs | - | 1 | 19.9 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Maurion Gordon | - | 1 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
| Desmond Glover | - | 1 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Marquez Terry | - | 1 | 20.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | -4.0 | 127 | 5.5 | 22.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG