🐻⬇️🏀

Mississippi University For Women Owls

Season: 2026
Also known as: Mississippi University For Women Owls
Program History

2026 Team Stats (1 games)

56.0
PPG
81.0
Opp
-25.0
Margin
30.8%
FG%
22.2%
3P%
83.3%
FT%
33.0
RPG
10.0
APG
29.0
TO
91.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 998 (#218) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → -8.7 (#401) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 64.1 More → 0.483 (#243) AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 64.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.295 (#392) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.332 (#373) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 929 (#302) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-05 @ Alcorn State Lady Braves L 56 - 81

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
C. Langford C. Langford G 1 32.0 13.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 15.0 5.0 - - - 33.3 33.3 0 - 43.3 43.3
M. Bowen M. Bowen F 1 20.0 13.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 9.0 9.0 - - - 44.4 0.0 100.0 - 58.0 44.4
T. Ross T. Ross G 1 16.0 9.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 4.0 -23 -1.6 -4.7 44.4 0.0 100.0 -3.29 47.7 44.4
F. Wilson F. Wilson G 1 30.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 80.0 - 35.1 0.0
J. Hughes J. Hughes G 1 21.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 125.0 125.0
J. Smith J. Smith G 1 23.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 101 4.2 6.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.48 25.8 0.0
K. Hughes K. Hughes F 1 11.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 - - - 0.0 0 50.0 - 36.2 0.0
K. Wilkins K. Wilkins C 1 5.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 53.2 0.0
B. Ciimban B. Ciimban F 1 6.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
K. Smith K. Smith G 1 11.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 -2.0 79 4.2 4.9 0.0 0 0 2.95 0.0 0.0
Calysia Phillips Calysia Phillips G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
J. Woodard J. Woodard G 1 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -42 -2.1 -10.5 0 0 0 -4.3 0 0
T. Hamilton T. Hamilton F 1 18.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
D. Love D. Love G 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Jacey Garrison Jacey Garrison F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG