🐻⬇️🏀

Mississippi College Choctaws

Season: 2025 2024 2022 2019 2012 2011
Also known as: Mississippi College Choctaws
Program History

Model Outputs

2021-2022
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 913 (#646) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 899 (#673) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More → 996 (#328) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → -11.6 (#667) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More → -5.5 (#420) HCA +2.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 69.3 More → 0.477 (#336) AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 69.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.369 (#415) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.389 (#403) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 942 (#297) RD 350 | GP 1

2022 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2021-11-30 @ Samford Bulldogs L 58 - 83

2022 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Z. Jones Z. Jones F 1 28.0 15.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 - - - 66.7 0 50.0 -0.68 64.4 66.7
G. Smith G. Smith - 1 17.0 12.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 14.0 -9 -0.4 -0.7 85.7 0 0 0.16 85.7 85.7
T. Thompson T. Thompson - 1 26.0 10.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 13.0 -3.0 -29 -1.6 -7.0 23.1 33.3 100.0 0.08 36.0 30.8
J. Jordan J. Jordan - 1 29.0 9.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 -45 -7.5 -14.4 50.0 0.0 75.0 0.13 58.0 50.0
M. Miller M. Miller G 1 34.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 44 2.4 3.6 23.1 16.7 0 0.4 26.9 26.9
D. Carter D. Carter - 1 16.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 167 5.6 7.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.96 25.8 0.0
B. Boston B. Boston F 1 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
A. Cowart Jr. A. Cowart Jr. G 1 12.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 -1.0 -68 -2.2 -3.1 0.0 0 0 2.01 0.0 0.0
T. Thurman T. Thurman - 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG