Minnesota
2020 Team Stats (11 games)
64.3
PPG
67.8
Opp
-4.2
Margin
40.3%
FG%
30.2%
3P%
68.5%
FT%
36.2
RPG
13.4
APG
10.4
TO
75.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1305 (#97) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1360 (#78) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.1 (#89) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.312 (#67) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.340 (#51) | NetEff -5.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.518 (#55) | AdjNet +0.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.519 (#54) | AdjNet +0.7 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | @ | Butler Bulldogs | L | 56 - 64 |
| 2019-12-09 | @ | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 52 - 72 |
| 2019-12-15 | vs | Ohio State Buckeyes | W | 84 - 71 |
| 2020-01-09 | @ | Michigan State Spartans | L | 58 - 74 |
| 2020-01-12 | vs | Michigan Wolverines | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2020-01-19 | @ | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | L | 56 - 64 |
| 2020-01-26 | vs | Michigan State Spartans | L | 52 - 70 |
| 2020-01-30 | @ | Illinois Fighting Illini | L | 51 - 59 |
| 2020-02-08 | @ | Penn State Nittany Lions | L | 77 - 83 |
| 2020-02-16 | vs | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2020-02-26 | vs | Maryland Terrapins | L | 73 - 74 |
| 2020-03-11 | vs | Northwestern Wildcats | W | 74 - 57 |
| 2020-03-12 | @ | Iowa Hawkeyes | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Oturu
|
- | 12 | 35.7 | 22.4 | 9.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 13.6 | 19.4 | - | - | - | 56.4 | 42.1 | 73.6 | - | 69.1 | 58.9 |
M. Carr
|
- | 12 | 36.3 | 13.9 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 11.7 | 12.1 | - | - | - | 37.9 | 37.0 | 76.2 | - | 52.7 | 45.0 |
G. Kalscheur
|
- | 12 | 34.1 | 8.4 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 9.2 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 31.5 | 23.2 | 58.3 | - | 43.4 | 38.7 |
P. Willis
|
G | 11 | 30.8 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 6.6 | 5.9 | - | - | - | 30.1 | 30.8 | 50.0 | - | 50.2 | 41.1 |
A. Demir
|
F | 12 | 25.1 | 6.3 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 40.6 | 20.0 | 82.4 | - | 49.7 | 43.5 |
I. Ihnen
|
F | 7 | 11.9 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 35.3 | 0 | - | 47.8 | 47.8 |
T. Williams
|
- | 12 | 16.2 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 32 | 2.7 | 5.7 | 35.1 | 27.8 | 44.4 | 0.54 | 42.7 | 41.9 |
J. Omersa
|
F | 12 | 11.7 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 14.3 | - | 38.1 | 42.9 |
M. Hurt
|
F | 9 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 25.3 | 27.8 |
S. Freeman
|
C | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Bryan Greenlee
|
- | 8 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG