๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Milwaukee

Also known as: Milwaukee Panthers
Program History

2012 Team Stats (4 games)

64.3
PPG
-
Opp
-
Margin
41.2%
FG%
27.7%
3P%
56.3%
FT%
33.8
RPG
10.8
APG
12.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.8
Adj PPG
62.0
Adj Opp PPG
#143
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1027 (#151) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1077 (#117) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More โ†’ 1021 (#138) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +2.0 (#143) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ -0.3 (#175) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.557 (#138) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +2.5 More โ†’ 0.572 (#151) AdjNet +2.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +2.6 More โ†’ 0.574 (#151) AdjNet +2.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.8 | AdjD 62.0 More โ†’ 0.542 (#143) AdjO 63.8 | AdjD 62.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.6 | AdjD 65.3 More โ†’ 0.486 (#180) AdjO 64.6 | AdjD 65.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.536 (#153) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.524 (#156) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 123 | GP 31 More โ†’ 1034 (#149) RD 123 | GP 31

2012 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2011-11-12 vs Southwest Minnesota State Golden Mustangs W 71 - 65
2011-11-14 @ Northern Illinois Huskies W 59 - 57
2011-11-18 vs IUPUI Jaguars W 62 - 49
2011-11-20 vs Texas Southern Tigers W 73 - 38
2011-11-23 @ Michigan State Spartans L 55 - 68
2011-11-26 @ Little Rock Trojans W 59 - 54
2011-12-01 vs Loyola Chicago Ramblers W 59 - 41
2011-12-03 vs UIC Flames W 73 - 71
2011-12-05 @ DePaul Blue Demons W 87 - 76
2011-12-10 @ Northern Iowa Panthers L 51 - 67
2011-12-13 vs Wisconsin Badgers L 54 - 60
2011-12-17 vs Omaha Mavericks W 86 - 50
2011-12-22 @ Marquette Golden Eagles L 50 - 64
2011-12-29 @ Valparaiso Beacons W 57 - 55
2011-12-31 @ Butler Bulldogs L 50 - 54
2012-01-03 @ Western Michigan Broncos L 61 - 72
2012-01-07 vs Green Bay Phoenix W 64 - 63
2012-01-14 vs Detroit Mercy Titans W 84 - 74
2012-01-20 @ Youngstown State Penguins L 66 - 68
2012-01-22 @ Cleveland State Vikings L 57 - 83
2012-01-26 vs Butler Bulldogs W 53 - 42
2012-01-28 vs Valparaiso Beacons L 52 - 55
2012-02-04 @ Green Bay Phoenix W 81 - 75
2012-02-10 @ Detroit Mercy Titans L 57 - 58
2012-02-12 @ Wright State Raiders L 46 - 70
2012-02-14 vs Cleveland State Vikings W 86 - 84
2012-02-18 vs Fairfield Stags W 67 - 63
2012-02-23 @ UIC Flames W 72 - 61
2012-02-25 @ Loyola Chicago Ramblers W 78 - 69
2012-02-28 vs UIC Flames W 68 - 55
2012-03-02 vs Butler Bulldogs L 49 - 71
2012-03-13 @ TCU Horned Frogs L 73 - 83

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
James Haarsma James Haarsma F 29 27.8 11.1 5.0 0.6 0.7 0.1 1.5 2.5 13.6 -15 24 -0.6 -1.0 52.1 36.4 51.3 -0.25 178.0 57.5
Tony Meier Tony Meier F 26 26.0 11.1 5.0 0.8 0.7 0.2 1.3 3.3 13.1 7 22 0.3 0.5 37.6 26.2 54.2 0.79 151.2 47.1
Kaylon Williams Kaylon Williams G 30 33.9 10.6 5.0 6.5 1.6 0.1 3.9 4.1 15.8 -15 25 -0.6 -0.8 35.2 25.4 41.7 -0.21 115.7 41.4
Ryan Allen Ryan Allen G 30 29.7 8.8 5.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 2.1 2.1 13.4 -1 25 0.0 -0.1 52.4 12.5 57.7 1.49 154.3 53.2
Paris Gulley Paris Gulley G 30 28.2 8.6 2.5 0.9 0.5 0.1 1.2 3.2 8.1 -16 25 -0.6 -1.0 36.8 40.0 90.0 -1.62 124.3 46.3
Kyle Kelm Kyle Kelm F 28 24.3 8.1 4.2 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.4 2.2 10.7 -37 23 -1.6 -2.9 44.4 25.0 70.6 -0.66 160.3 48.4
Ja'Rob McCallum Ja'Rob McCallum G 4 26.5 7.5 2.5 1.0 1.2 0.0 1.2 3.0 8.0 - - - - 25.0 0.0 0 2.03 125.0 25.0
Evan Richard Evan Richard G 21 11.4 2.4 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 2.5 -11 18 -0.6 -2.5 29.2 20.0 100.0 -0.11 102.5 35.4
Shaquille Boga Shaquille Boga G 28 7.9 2.3 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.9 2.9 -25 24 -1.0 -5.1 34.6 50.0 50.0 -2.33 105.3 40.4
Demetrius Harris Demetrius Harris - 15 7.3 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.9 2.3 - - - - 42.9 0.0 37.5 - 79.9 42.9
Ryan Haggerty Ryan Haggerty F 27 10.7 1.6 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 2.6 -44 23 -1.9 -7.1 40.0 20.0 66.7 -2.9 174.1 45.0
Mitch Roelke Mitch Roelke G 12 4.3 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.3 -10 12 -0.8 -9.5 20.0 33.3 0 -2.33 90.0 30.0
Christian Wolf Christian Wolf F 16 4.8 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.9 -17 16 -1.1 -10.2 28.6 0 50.0 -2.33 46.7 28.6
Quinton Gustavson Quinton Gustavson F 6 3.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 -5 5 -1.0 -12.8 0.0 0.0 0 -1.84 75.0 0.0
Demetrius Harris Demetrius Harris F 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 -3.0 - - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG