Michigan Tech
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1326 (#16) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1355 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1183 (#18) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +18.1 (#26) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +18.7 (#67) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.813 (#17) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.979 (#116) | NetEff +35.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.952 (#10) | AdjNet +25.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.954 (#8) | AdjNet +26.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.850 (#10) | AdjO 83.5 | AdjD 64.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.791 (#23) | AdjO 77.0 | AdjD 62.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.885 (#16) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.877 (#16) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1311 (#12) | RD 99 | GP 24 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-01 | vs | DBU | W | 75 - 70 |
| 2025-11-02 | vs | Lenoir-Rhyne | W | 66 - 65 |
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Mo.-St. Louis | L | 57 - 78 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Maryville (MO) | W | 72 - 61 |
| 2025-11-21 | @ | Minn. Duluth | W | 57 - 48 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | St. Cloud St. | W | 63 - 59 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | Lakeland | W | 92 - 56 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | Roosevelt | W | 73 - 55 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Wis.-Parkside | W | 69 - 54 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Wis.-Stout | W | 79 - 41 |
| 2025-12-19 | @ | Florida Tech | W | 64 - 52 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Lynn | W | 105 - 67 |
| 2026-01-02 | vs | Grand Valley St. | L | 75 - 79 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Davenport | W | 77 - 68 |
| 2026-01-08 | vs | Northern Mich. | W | 84 - 75 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Ferris St. | W | 81 - 72 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Saginaw Valley | W | 80 - 78 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Lake Superior St. | W | 84 - 83 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Wayne St. (MI) | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Purdue Northwest | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-29 | @ | Davenport | L | 69 - 72 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Grand Valley St. | L | 46 - 55 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Lake Superior St. | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Saginaw Valley | W | 62 - 52 |
| 2026-02-12 | @ | Purdue Northwest | W | 63 - 61 |
| 2026-02-14 | @ | Wayne St. (MI) | W | 77 - 73 |
| 2026-02-19 | @ | Northern Mich. | L | 64 - 70 |
| 2026-02-23 | @ | Ferris St. | W | 79 - 68 |
| 2026-02-26 | vs | Wis.-Parkside | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2026-02-28 | vs | Roosevelt | W | 99 - 72 |
| 2026-03-04 | vs | Davenport | W | 72 - 70 |
| 2026-03-07 | vs | Grand Valley St. | L | 70 - 82 |
| 2026-03-14 | vs | Lake Erie | W | 83 - 73 |
| 2026-03-15 | @ | Grand Valley St. | W | 69 - 67 |
| 2026-03-17 | @ | Walsh | W | 87 - 70 |
| 2026-03-25 | vs | Gannon | L | 49 - 75 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Tomashek | - | 33 | 30.8 | 21.2 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 17.4 | 8.7 | - | - | - | - | 38.4 | 35.5 | 78.3 | - | 53.1 | 47.6 |
| Dawson Nordgaard | - | 34 | 21.2 | 9.4 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 5.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | - | 63.8 | 0.0 | 69.9 | - | 67.1 | 63.8 |
| Gabe Smith | - | 34 | 27.0 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 6.3 | 10.7 | - | - | - | - | 48.4 | 24.2 | 48.2 | - | 51.1 | 50.2 |
| Ty Fernholz | - | 34 | 19.0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 34.6 | 32.4 | 77.3 | - | 50.2 | 48.8 |
| Jesse Napgezek | - | 33 | 16.5 | 7.6 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 7.3 | - | - | - | - | 48.1 | 22.9 | 70.1 | - | 58.6 | 50.6 |
| Nate Abel | - | 34 | 28.9 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.7 | 10.5 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 43.8 | 75.4 | - | 58.0 | 53.7 |
| Josh Terrian | - | 34 | 25.2 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | 40.9 | 39.1 | 73.3 | - | 60.9 | 59.6 |
| Matt Schmainda | - | 34 | 15.3 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 2.7 | - | - | - | - | 38.0 | 31.2 | 69.2 | - | 48.6 | 47.3 |
| Grant Warren | - | 34 | 11.4 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 4.2 | - | - | - | - | 48.3 | 23.1 | 85.0 | - | 55.8 | 51.7 |
| Drew Barrie | - | 24 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | 40.0 | 38.9 | 66.7 | - | 53.6 | 51.7 |
| Peyton LaCombe | - | 12 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 55.6 | 66.7 | 100.0 | - | 70.9 | 66.7 |
| Layne Risdon | - | 13 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 44.4 | 40.0 | 0.0 | - | 50.6 | 55.6 |
| Alex Calcaterra | - | 18 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 57.1 | 57.1 |
| Luke Hazelton | - | 16 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Ethan Heck | - | 11 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | -0.3 | - | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| Connor Cameron | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Jacob MacPhee | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Bliesner | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG