Miami - 2020 | Sports Data

2020 Team Stats (7 games)

63.9

PPG

79.1

Opp

-12.4

Margin

37.0%

FG%

29.4%

3P%

79.1%

FT%

32.1

RPG

7.1

APG

13.1

TO

79.9

Pace

Model Outputs

2019-2020

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	1320 (#92)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1390 (#68)	-
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More →	+33.8 (#58)	HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.123 (#91)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -21.8 More →	0.077 (#72)	NetEff -21.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -11.5 More →	0.209 (#96)	AdjNet -11.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -11.5 More →	0.209 (#96)	AdjNet -11.5

2020 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2019-11-05	vs	Louisville Cardinals	L	74 - 87
2019-11-12	@	UCF Knights	W	79 - 70
2020-01-04	vs	Duke Blue Devils	L	62 - 95
2020-01-07	@	Louisville Cardinals	L	58 - 74
2020-01-18	vs	Florida State Seminoles	L	79 - 83
2020-01-21	@	Duke Blue Devils	L	59 - 89
2020-02-08	@	Florida State Seminoles	L	81 - 99
2020-03-04	vs	Virginia Cavaliers	L	44 - 46
2020-03-11	@	Clemson Tigers	L	64 - 69

2020 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
C. Lykes	G	9	30.7	14.8	1.6	2.0	0.8	0.3	2.3	11.7	5.4	-	-	-	35.2	41.3	84.6	-	57.1	44.3
D. Vasiljevic	G	9	33.4	13.2	3.9	1.3	0.8	0.0	1.0	10.3	7.9	-	-	-	39.8	32.1	100.0	-	60.8	49.5
K. McGusty	G	9	26.8	11.0	3.4	1.6	0.7	0.1	2.3	8.6	5.9	-	-	-	39.0	24.2	73.1	-	56.0	44.2
Harlond Beverly	G	9	18.4	6.7	1.4	1.7	0.4	0.1	2.0	5.8	2.6	-	-	-	36.5	14.3	68.8	-0.0	50.8	38.5
K. Stone	F	4	27.5	6.5	4.2	0.5	2.5	0.8	1.2	6.0	7.2	-	-	-	41.7	27.3	75.0	-	50.5	47.9
R. Miller Jr.	C	8	21.5	5.6	6.2	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.5	4.1	7.8	-16	-1.1	-1.5	48.5	0	77.8	0.83	60.9	48.5
Isaiah Wong	-	9	18.1	5.1	2.1	0.4	0.3	0.1	2.0	4.6	1.6	-	-	-	36.6	33.3	73.3	-	48.3	40.2
S. Waardenburg	F	9	28.7	4.9	6.0	1.0	1.0	0.8	0.7	4.0	9.0	-	-	-	38.9	15.4	80.0	-	51.6	41.7
A. Walker	-	8	13.1	2.6	2.4	0.4	0.8	0.6	0.2	2.0	4.5	17	1.4	2.7	25.0	0.0	66.7	0.34	56.3	25.0
D. Gak	F	2	12.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	1.5	1.0	0.5	0.5	5.5	-	-	-	100.0	0	66.7	-	86.2	100.0
W. Herenton	G	3	2.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.7	0.3	-	-	-	50.0	0.0	100.0	-	61.5	50.0
F. Gkogkos	-	2	1.5	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.0	-	-	-	0.0	0	0	-	0.0	0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG