Miami (OH) Redhawks

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: Miami (OH) Redhawks

Program History

2026 Team Stats (35 games)

70.5

PPG

59.1

Opp

+11.4

Margin

44.4%

FG%

35.3%

3P%

75.7%

FT%

33.1

RPG

15.9

APG

15.6

70.3

Est. poss./game

66.3

Adj PPG

57.5

Adj Opp PPG

#82

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	1248 (#60)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1198 (#66)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	1123 (#42)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	+9.1 (#82)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	+10.1 (#74)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.838 (#53)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +12.9 More →	0.838 (#53)	NetEff +12.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +14.5 More →	0.841 (#78)	AdjNet +14.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +14.5 More →	0.843 (#80)	AdjNet +14.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.3 \| AdjD 57.5 More →	0.690 (#82)	AdjO 66.3 \| AdjD 57.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.4 \| AdjD 57.6 More →	0.671 (#70)	AdjO 65.4 \| AdjD 57.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.768 (#68)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.765 (#70)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 108 \| GP 33 More →	1227 (#50)	RD 108 \| GP 33

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-03	@	Coastal Carolina Chanticleers	W	63 - 53
2025-11-07	vs	Cedarville Yellow Jackets	W	88 - 49
2025-11-10	@	Oakland Golden Grizzlies	L	75 - 80
2025-11-13	vs	IU Southeast Grenadiers	W	94 - 40
2025-11-16	@	Bellarmine Knights	W	77 - 58
2025-11-23	@	Purdue Boilermakers	L	68 - 79
2025-11-28	@	Washington State Cougars	L	67 - 71
2025-11-29	@	Marist Red Foxes	W	63 - 37
2025-12-03	@	Cincinnati Bearcats	W	75 - 71
2025-12-07	vs	Western Kentucky Lady Toppers	W	80 - 53
2025-12-14	@	Colorado Buffaloes	L	55 - 75
2025-12-20	vs	Green Bay Phoenix	W	66 - 50
2025-12-31	@	Kent State Golden Flashes	W	67 - 63
2026-01-03	vs	Toledo Rockets	W	63 - 55
2026-01-07	vs	Massachusetts Minutewomen	W	72 - 60
2026-01-10	@	Akron Zips	W	79 - 56
2026-01-14	vs	Eastern Michigan Eagles	W	69 - 55
2026-01-17	@	Bowling Green Falcons	W	51 - 49
2026-01-21	vs	Buffalo Bulls	W	76 - 52
2026-01-24	@	Ball State Cardinals	W	72 - 52
2026-01-28	@	Northern Illinois Huskies	W	71 - 43
2026-01-31	vs	Ohio Bobcats	W	90 - 70
2026-02-07	vs	Georgia Southern Eagles	W	78 - 67
2026-02-10	@	Western Michigan Broncos	W	60 - 55
2026-02-14	@	Massachusetts Minutewomen	L	64 - 65
2026-02-18	vs	Central Michigan Chippewas	W	65 - 53
2026-02-21	vs	Ball State Cardinals	W	68 - 64
2026-02-25	@	Eastern Michigan Eagles	W	78 - 60
2026-02-28	vs	Akron Zips	W	74 - 56
2026-03-04	vs	Kent State Golden Flashes	W	71 - 52
2026-03-07	@	Ohio Bobcats	L	62 - 77
2026-03-11	vs	Kent State Golden Flashes	W	65 - 58
2026-03-13	vs	Ohio Bobcats	W	80 - 52
2026-03-14	vs	Toledo Rockets	W	68 - 58
2026-03-21	@	West Virginia Mountaineers	L	54 - 82

2026 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Amber Tretter	F	35	30.5	14.4	8.0	1.6	1.3	1.1	2.0	10.2	14.3	240	32	7.5	10.5	50.6	36.6	74.3	-0.91	60.5	56.3
Amber Scalia	G	35	31.9	13.7	3.0	2.5	0.9	0.1	2.5	10.9	6.8	321	31	10.4	13.7	41.7	34.2	81.6	3.81	55.5	50.7
Ilse de Vries	F	35	30.6	12.7	4.9	0.8	1.0	1.9	1.8	9.9	9.6	290	32	9.1	12.8	49.4	38.6	71.7	2.67	59.6	57.9
Tamar Singer	G	35	33.6	10.9	3.9	6.9	2.6	0.1	4.1	8.8	11.5	317	32	9.9	12.8	43.3	31.7	84.1	3.75	55.0	49.8
Brooke Blumenfeld	F	7	12.1	7.1	2.6	0.1	0.4	0.1	0.9	4.9	4.7	3	5	0.6	3.2	58.8	0.0	100.0	-3.52	65.1	58.8
Nuria Jurjo	G	32	29.5	6.6	4.2	2.2	2.2	0.2	1.8	5.7	8.0	224	30	7.5	10.9	40.9	41.6	65.8	0.53	53.1	51.1
Clara Gonzalez Planella	G	35	14.2	4.0	1.5	0.9	0.9	0.1	0.8	3.9	2.7	65	32	2.0	6.8	35.8	35.6	67.7	-2.18	46.5	43.4
Macie Taylor	G	35	12.9	3.9	1.5	0.7	0.8	0.1	0.9	3.4	2.7	63	32	2.0	7.0	44.2	33.3	84.2	-2.88	53.0	50.0
Ashton Elley	G	26	5.9	1.5	0.7	0.1	0.2	0.1	0.2	1.3	1.1	19	23	0.8	5.7	36.4	36.4	57.1	-0.98	55.4	54.5
Mio Sakano	G	33	8.7	1.5	0.6	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.4	1.6	0.7	0	30	0.0	0.0	34.0	20.8	66.7	-1.84	42.0	38.7
Emily VanTimmeren	F	28	4.2	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.9	0.9	-22	21	-1.0	-9.6	44.0	33.3	43.8	-5.06	46.8	46.0
Anna Hurst	G	23	2.6	0.2	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.5	0.0	-25	18	-1.4	-24.1	16.7	16.7	0	-4.03	20.8	20.8

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

1984 located field-goal attempts in 35 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Ilse de VriesAmber TretterAmber ScaliaTamar Singer

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	361-586	61.6	722	Amber Tretter 24% (176 pts)	Ilse de Vries 20% (142 pts)	Amber Tretter 20% (44 misses)	Tamar Singer 19% (42 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	174-421	41.3	348	Amber Tretter 24% (84 pts)	Ilse de Vries 18% (64 pts)	Amber Tretter 20% (50 misses)	Tamar Singer 15% (38 misses)
Mid-range left	20-49	40.8	40	Amber Scalia 40% (16 pts)	Ilse de Vries 15% (6 pts)	Amber Scalia 31% (9 misses)	Ilse de Vries 24% (7 misses)
Mid-range center	11-29	37.9	22	Amber Scalia 36% (8 pts)	Amber Tretter 27% (6 pts)	Amber Scalia 22% (4 misses)	Clara Gonzalez Planella 17% (3 misses)
Mid-range right	24-62	38.7	48	Amber Tretter 29% (14 pts)	Amber Scalia 25% (12 pts)	Amber Scalia 18% (7 misses)	Nuria Jurjo 18% (7 misses)
Left corner 3	34-104	32.7	102	Ilse de Vries 35% (36 pts)	Clara Gonzalez Planella 18% (18 pts)	Ilse de Vries 30% (21 misses)	Amber Scalia 13% (9 misses)
Right corner 3	25-64	39.1	75	Amber Scalia 24% (18 pts)	Ilse de Vries 20% (15 pts)	Ilse de Vries 23% (9 misses)	Amber Scalia 21% (8 misses)
Above-break 3 left	85-250	34.0	255	Amber Scalia 36% (93 pts)	Ilse de Vries 14% (36 pts)	Amber Scalia 30% (49 misses)	Tamar Singer 15% (24 misses)
Above-break 3 center	49-145	33.8	147	Tamar Singer 24% (36 pts)	Amber Scalia 22% (33 pts)	Amber Scalia 29% (28 misses)	Amber Tretter 25% (24 misses)
Above-break 3 right	98-274	35.8	294	Ilse de Vries 20% (60 pts)	Amber Tretter 19% (57 pts)	Amber Scalia 22% (38 misses)	Tamar Singer 22% (38 misses)