🐻⬇️🏀

Menlo College Oaks

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2022 2016 2013 2012 2010 2008
Also known as: Menlo Oaks
Program History

2024 Team Stats (1 games)

69.0
PPG
106.0
Opp
-37.0
Margin
40.7%
FG%
20.0%
3P%
81.0%
FT%
25.0
RPG
12.0
APG
14.0
TO
82.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2021-2022 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More → 994 (#390) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → -0.6 (#503) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More → -6.2 (#428) HCA +2.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 68.9 More → 0.476 (#348) AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 68.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.371 (#409) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.385 (#407) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 913 (#423) RD 350 | GP 1

2024 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2023-11-29 @ Santa Clara Broncos L 69 - 106

2024 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
K. Williams K. Williams - 1 25.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 13.0 1.0 4 0.2 6.1 38.5 16.7 100.0 -0.24 46.8 42.3
B. Iuli B. Iuli - 1 29.0 11.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 7.0 11.0 - - - 42.9 0 71.4 - 54.6 42.9
Landon Seaman Landon Seaman - 1 27.0 10.0 6.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 10.0 9.0 - - - 40.0 0 50.0 - 42.5 40.0
J. Alcantara J. Alcantara - 1 34.0 8.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 7.0 - - - 80.0 0 0 - 80.0 80.0
E. Blackwell III E. Blackwell III - 1 12.0 7.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 70 3.0 17.3 40.0 33.3 100.0 0.2 59.5 50.0
N. High N. High - 1 35.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 11.0 - - - 20.0 0.0 100.0 - 44.4 20.0
R. Robinson R. Robinson - 1 8.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 14 1.4 3.4 50.0 0.0 100.0 0.25 61.5 50.0
S. Arikat S. Arikat - 1 16.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.0 - - - 33.3 33.3 0 - 50.0 50.0
G. Cox G. Cox - 1 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 - - - 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0
C. Baeza C. Baeza - 1 11.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG