Medgar Evers Cougars
Also known as: Medgar Evers Cougars
Program History
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 835 (#733) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 793 (#755) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 991 (#447) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -46.7 (#992) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -36.1 (#641) | HCA +2.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.366 (#596) | AdjO 67.3 | AdjD 73.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.070 (#642) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.109 (#639) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 792 (#617) | RD 350 | GP 2 |
2022 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | @ | Fairfield Stags | L | 55 - 110 |
| 2021-12-14 | @ | St. Francis Brooklyn Terriers | L | 51 - 113 |
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Evans Jr.
|
- | 2 | 31.5 | 16.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | -68 | -2.2 | -3.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.01 | 0 | 0 |
Dante Simmons
|
G | 1 | 34.0 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | -34 | -2.0 | -4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.19 | 0 | 0 |
J. Jean Pierre
|
- | 2 | 23.5 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A. Cotterel
|
- | 2 | 17.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
E. Hardison
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.52 | 0 | 0 |
P. Reid
|
- | 1 | 25.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Johnson
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | -43 | -8.6 | -31.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.56 | 0 | 0 |
M. Sinera
|
- | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.38 | 0 | 0 |
J. Julien
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Edosomwan
|
- | 1 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG