Marywood
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1014 (#219) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 990 (#335) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 945 (#573) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -11.4 (#299) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -14.3 (#549) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.274 (#548) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.366 (#397) | NetEff -3.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.050 (#604) | AdjNet -25.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.043 (#604) | AdjNet -26.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.192 (#593) | AdjO 54.8 | AdjD 70.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.313 (#593) | AdjO 58.3 | AdjD 66.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.267 (#554) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.273 (#551) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 951 (#373) | RD 96 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | @ | Messiah | L | 48 - 81 |
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Saint Vincent | L | 48 - 69 |
| 2025-11-11 | vs | Penn St. Harrisburg | W | 80 - 60 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Houghton | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Bryn Mawr | W | 66 - 53 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | John Jay | W | 73 - 63 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Elmira | W | 66 - 62 |
| 2025-12-09 | @ | Hofstra | L | 44 - 80 |
| 2025-12-15 | vs | Penn College | W | 65 - 54 |
| 2025-12-17 | @ | Wm. Paterson | L | 57 - 70 |
| 2025-12-30 | @ | Lebanon Valley | L | 42 - 68 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Pratt | W | 58 - 46 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Gwynedd Mercy | W | 78 - 74 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Saint Elizabeth | L | 53 - 58 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Neumann | W | 61 - 52 |
| 2026-01-23 | @ | Marymount (VA) | L | 72 - 77 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Immaculata | L | 62 - 73 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Centenary (NJ) | L | 59 - 68 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Gwynedd Mercy | W | 63 - 53 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Pratt | W | 74 - 65 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jewlya Mccullon | - | 1 | 36.0 | 19.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 9.0 | -50 | -2.5 | -13.1 | 22.2 | 25.0 | 87.5 | -0.49 | 44.1 | 33.3 |
| Megan Cavoli | - | 20 | 31.9 | 10.9 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 10.0 | 6.0 | -28 | -1.4 | -5.5 | 41.0 | 23.3 | 78.4 | 1.94 | 49.0 | 44.5 |
| Olivia Ciullo | - | 10 | 25.0 | 10.3 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 8.8 | 11 | 1.2 | 7.3 | 48.0 | 30.8 | 93.1 | -1.69 | 58.7 | 50.7 |
| Anyah Ortiz | - | 19 | 29.1 | 9.2 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 10.4 | 5.2 | -16 | -0.8 | -3.0 | 31.0 | 14.8 | 68.1 | -1.96 | 38.3 | 32.0 |
| Mia Blume | - | 20 | 33.0 | 7.4 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 7.4 | -68 | -3.4 | -11.8 | 33.6 | 33.3 | 76.7 | -2.28 | 50.3 | 46.6 |
| Alli Anstadt | - | 20 | 25.1 | 7.3 | 5.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 26 | 1.3 | 6.0 | 39.3 | 41.7 | 60.3 | 3.69 | 45.5 | 41.1 |
| Alli Griscavage | - | 18 | 11.4 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 5.5 | -17 | -0.9 | -8.7 | 51.4 | 28.6 | 56.5 | 2.23 | 55.3 | 54.1 |
| Tamari Hubbard | - | 19 | 21.1 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 5.6 | 4.7 | 12 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 34.9 | 11.8 | 66.7 | 2.57 | 38.2 | 35.8 |
| Maddie Labatch | - | 18 | 8.5 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 0.9 | -25 | -1.4 | -17.0 | 33.3 | 31.4 | 87.5 | -1.62 | 48.5 | 44.8 |
| Kendel Card | - | 17 | 8.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.1 | -70 | -3.9 | -37.2 | 24.2 | 0.0 | 57.1 | -2.66 | 35.3 | 24.2 |
| Kameryn Cortinas | - | 2 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Daniella Ashby | - | 20 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | -15 | -0.8 | -12.3 | 23.8 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 0.07 | 26.4 | 26.2 |
| Chloe Mendicino | - | 14 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | -24 | -1.8 | -49.8 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -2.79 | 22.5 | 12.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG