Loyola Marymount Lions
2022 Team Stats (3 games)
53.3
PPG
74.3
Opp
-5.2
Margin
36.6%
FG%
25.4%
3P%
55.6%
FT%
29.0
RPG
7.0
APG
15.3
TO
76.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1034 (#248) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1176 (#170) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.7 (#148) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.219 (#103) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.007 (#338) | NetEff -42.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.198 (#97) | AdjNet -12.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.196 (#97) | AdjNet -12.2 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Lucas
|
G | 2 | 35.0 | 15.5 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 24.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
E. Scott
|
G | 10 | 34.3 | 13.8 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 13.2 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 25.0 | 66.7 | - | 155.8 | 44.9 |
J. Quintana
|
- | 16 | 32.7 | 11.6 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 45.2 | 90.9 | - | 186.6 | 55.6 |
D. Douglas
|
G | 3 | 25.7 | 10.7 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 12.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 97.6 | 50.0 |
K. Leaupepe
|
- | 24 | 26.3 | 9.2 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 13.4 | - | - | - | 46.4 | 37.5 | 100.0 | - | 375.2 | 51.8 |
C. Shelton
|
- | 28 | 31.0 | 8.4 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 12.2 | - | - | - | 39.3 | 22.2 | 27.3 | - | 357.8 | 42.9 |
J. Anderson
|
PG | 8 | 23.2 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 31.2 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.77 | 171.9 | 34.4 |
A. Merkviladze
|
- | 28 | 20.7 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 447.1 | 31.2 |
L. Bockler
|
G | 1 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
G. Harris
|
G | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | -15 | -1.4 | -3.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.24 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
K. Marble
|
- | 10 | 17.8 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 37.5 | - | 99.9 | 60.0 |
D. Elliott IV
|
G | 3 | 4.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 500.0 | 0.0 |
L. Lewis
|
- | 27 | 10.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 3.0 | -39 | -7.8 | -10.1 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.11 | 198.1 | 16.7 |
Q. Jackson Jr.
|
G | 7 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 33.3 |
J. Nobles
|
SG | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG