Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters
2005 Team Stats (1 games)
61.0
PPG
66.0
Opp
-5.0
Margin
41.0%
FG%
30.0%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
29.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
73.6
Adj PPG
60.5
Adj Opp PPG
#48
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2004-2005
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1206 (#44) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1212 (#50) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1060 (#92) | HCA +92 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +14.5 (#47) | HCA +3.6 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +11.5 (#62) | HCA +3.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.751 (#67) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.927 (#48) | AdjNet +22.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.929 (#51) | AdjNet +22.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.768 (#48) | AdjO 73.6 | AdjD 60.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.659 (#59) | AdjO 72.5 | AdjD 65.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.804 (#50) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.786 (#51) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1208 (#44) | RD 111 | GP 30 |
2005 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-11-24 | @ | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 88 - 70 |
| 2004-11-28 | vs | Arkansas State Red Wolves | W | 67 - 50 |
| 2004-11-30 | @ | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 55 - 72 |
| 2004-12-02 | vs | Western Kentucky Lady Toppers | W | 73 - 60 |
| 2004-12-04 | vs | Illinois Fighting Illini | L | 65 - 71 |
| 2004-12-13 | @ | Alcorn State Lady Braves | W | 62 - 61 |
| 2004-12-15 | vs | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | L | 59 - 70 |
| 2004-12-18 | @ | Oklahoma Sooners | L | 59 - 86 |
| 2004-12-30 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 63 - 47 |
| 2005-01-01 | vs | Rice Owls | W | 76 - 66 |
| 2005-01-06 | @ | Nevada Wolf Pack | W | 69 - 52 |
| 2005-01-08 | @ | Fresno State Bulldogs | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2005-01-13 | vs | San Josรฉ State Spartans | W | 66 - 52 |
| 2005-01-15 | vs | Hawai'i Rainbow Wahine | W | 68 - 54 |
| 2005-01-22 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 69 - 62 |
| 2005-01-27 | @ | Boise State Broncos | L | 59 - 62 |
| 2005-01-29 | @ | UTEP Miners | W | 82 - 69 |
| 2005-02-03 | vs | Fresno State Bulldogs | W | 86 - 76 |
| 2005-02-05 | vs | Nevada Wolf Pack | W | 108 - 72 |
| 2005-02-10 | @ | Hawai'i Rainbow Wahine | L | 78 - 79 |
| 2005-02-12 | @ | San Josรฉ State Spartans | W | 80 - 51 |
| 2005-02-19 | vs | SMU Mustangs | W | 77 - 63 |
| 2005-02-24 | vs | UTEP Miners | W | 81 - 66 |
| 2005-02-26 | vs | Boise State Broncos | W | 85 - 48 |
| 2005-03-03 | @ | Rice Owls | L | 69 - 83 |
| 2005-03-05 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 70 - 74 |
| 2005-03-09 | vs | Boise State Broncos | W | 81 - 68 |
| 2005-03-11 | vs | Fresno State Bulldogs | W | 92 - 87 |
| 2005-03-12 | vs | Rice Owls | L | 66 - 86 |
| 2005-03-20 | @ | Temple Owls | L | 61 - 66 |
2005 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Crain
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 26.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | - | 73.3 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 73.7 | 73.3 |
T. Hassell
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 38.5 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 46.8 | 42.3 |
L. Barkus
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 31.2 | 31.2 |
D. Diener
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG