LSU
2006 Team Stats (16 games)
68.7
PPG
55.2
Opp
+13.5
Margin
45.2%
FG%
29.7%
3P%
66.6%
FT%
35.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
76.3
Adj PPG
44.4
Adj Opp PPG
#3
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1515 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1490 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1211 (#8) | HCA +87 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +33.9 (#3) | HCA +3.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +28.9 (#5) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.978 (#2) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.998 (#3) | AdjNet +52.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.998 (#3) | AdjNet +53.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.948 (#3) | AdjO 76.3 | AdjD 44.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.870 (#5) | AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 48.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.968 (#5) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.961 (#5) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1458 (#5) | RD 99 | GP 35 |
2006 Schedule & Results
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Augustus
|
NA | 16 | 0.0 | 22.4 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 18.4 | 8.9 | - | - | - | - | 49.5 | 40.0 | 78.9 | - | 54.9 | 51.2 |
S. Fowles
|
NA | 16 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 11.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 17.9 | - | - | - | - | 61.5 | 0.0 | 58.2 | - | 62.6 | 61.5 |
S. Hoston
|
NA | 16 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 3.8 | - | - | - | - | 39.1 | 35.7 | 86.5 | - | 52.3 | 46.6 |
E. White
|
NA | 10 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 4.9 | - | - | - | - | 38.0 | 0.0 | 68.8 | - | 46.8 | 38.0 |
F. Williams
|
NA | 5 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - | 35.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 38.6 | 35.7 |
R. LeBlanc
|
NA | 6 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 2.7 | - | - | - | - | 37.9 | 20.0 | 37.5 | - | 40.0 | 39.7 |
Crowe, Thomas
|
- | 11 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.7 | 4.9 | - | - | - | - | 36.5 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 39.6 | 36.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG