LIFE Pacific
Also known as: LIFE Pacific
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 973 (#342) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 969 (#321) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 992 (#442) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -28.5 (#641) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.001 (#687) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.000 (#517) | NetEff -68.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.021 (#667) | AdjNet -32.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.020 (#666) | AdjNet -32.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.137 (#658) | AdjO 55.3 | AdjD 75.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.373 (#557) | AdjO 59.8 | AdjD 65.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.154 (#627) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.179 (#616) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 935 (#316) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooklyn Waldram | - | 1 | 31.7 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 40.5 | 44.4 |
| Jaelyn Ramos | - | 1 | 23.6 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 44.4 | 42.9 |
| Adrianna Torres | - | 1 | 25.3 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | -4.0 | -28 | -1.6 | -38.2 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -2.06 | 27.6 | 20.0 |
| Ysabel Puente | - | 1 | 25.8 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
| Sophia Abella | - | 1 | 37.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Kailey New | - | 1 | 20.2 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Ebony Cooper | - | 1 | 23.8 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | -3.0 | 95 | 4.3 | 21.9 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0 | -3.82 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
| Shekinah Brattrud | - | 1 | 12.1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG