Ky. Wesleyan
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1145 (#58) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1141 (#68) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1114 (#62) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +6.1 (#112) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +6.1 (#263) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.732 (#277) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.691 (#220) | NetEff +6.1 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.006 (#461) | NetEff -38.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.840 (#251) | AdjNet +14.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.852 (#248) | AdjNet +14.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.716 (#242) | AdjO 73.0 | AdjD 62.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.594 (#179) | AdjO 64.9 | AdjD 60.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.687 (#190) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.681 (#195) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1168 (#61) | RD 98 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Tenn. Southern | W | 84 - 71 |
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Missouri S&T | L | 71 - 81 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Lincoln (MO) | W | 69 - 64 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Trevecca Nazarene | W | 75 - 69 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Mo.-St. Louis | L | 32 - 69 |
| 2025-11-26 | vs | Midway | W | 95 - 61 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | Ohio Dominican | W | 66 - 60 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Findlay | L | 63 - 92 |
| 2025-12-11 | vs | Ashland | W | 84 - 72 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Tiffin | W | 77 - 65 |
| 2025-12-31 | vs | Ind.-Southeast | W | 83 - 38 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Ursuline | W | 78 - 67 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Northwood | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Malone | W | 65 - 63 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Walsh | L | 38 - 64 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Thomas More | L | 50 - 67 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Cedarville | W | 74 - 67 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Findlay | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Ohio Dominican | W | 64 - 57 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Ashland | W | 70 - 65 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Bruwer | - | 20 | 23.3 | 12.6 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 10.1 | 6.5 | 114 | 5.0 | 26.0 | 43.1 | 29.9 | 79.7 | 2.01 | 54.2 | 48.8 |
| Riley Neal | - | 20 | 22.8 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 9.2 | 7.3 | 65 | 2.8 | 13.8 | 45.4 | 27.3 | 82.6 | -1.05 | 54.6 | 50.3 |
| Myah Montgomery | - | 20 | 27.0 | 10.2 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 53 | 2.3 | 11.0 | 42.3 | 27.2 | 74.1 | -1.17 | 52.9 | 50.8 |
| Georgia Acompanado | - | 20 | 19.1 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 8.2 | 52 | 2.4 | 17.6 | 48.5 | 20.0 | 63.6 | 0.22 | 54.9 | 50.5 |
| Iratxe Amorrortu Sainz | - | 20 | 20.4 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 68 | 3.1 | 18.3 | 42.2 | 40.0 | 66.7 | 0.39 | 55.1 | 53.3 |
| Carson Sisk | - | 18 | 19.3 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 65 | 3.1 | 19.1 | 42.5 | 39.4 | 64.3 | 0.59 | 53.1 | 51.4 |
| Ricky Kapteijn | - | 20 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 17 | 0.8 | 5.4 | 32.9 | 28.3 | 80.0 | -0.89 | 44.6 | 40.9 |
| Avah Montgomery | - | 18 | 10.1 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 36 | 1.8 | 35.9 | 35.8 | 40.7 | 88.2 | 1.16 | 52.9 | 46.2 |
| Vilborg Jonsdottir | - | 20 | 22.6 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 38 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 47.4 | 1.42 | 40.2 | 38.8 |
| Lily Hoagland | - | 13 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 13 | 0.9 | 11.9 | 56.7 | 53.3 | 66.7 | 1.13 | 70.5 | 70.0 |
| Lena Stinebrickner | - | 18 | 15.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 19 | 0.9 | 7.3 | 31.6 | 30.6 | 73.3 | -2.44 | 45.6 | 41.2 |
| Samantha Shehan | - | 7 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 29 | 3.2 | 346.3 | 35.3 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.01 | 47.1 | 47.1 |
| Alexis Shehan | - | 10 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 34 | 2.8 | 142.7 | 61.5 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.65 | 57.6 | 61.5 |
| Hilary Shikuku | - | 3 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 15 | 3.0 | 198.9 | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.03 | 53.2 | 0.0 |
| Ella Finley | - | 6 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 19 | 2.4 | 251.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.03 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG