Kean Cougars
Season:
2026
Also known as: Kean Cougars
Program History
2026 Team Stats (1 games)
27.0
PPG
89.0
Opp
-62.0
Margin
18.2%
FG%
14.3%
3P%
53.3%
FT%
32.0
RPG
5.0
APG
34.0
TO
84.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 998 (#224) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -22.7 (#503) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.457 (#327) | AdjO 62.1 | AdjD 64.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.076 (#544) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.117 (#544) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 899 (#411) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-11 | @ | Long Island University Sharks | L | 27 - 89 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Mercedes
|
G | 1 | 32.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 11.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 0.0 | 80.0 | - | 30.3 | 18.2 |
M. Edwards
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | -70 | -3.2 | -7.2 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.77 | 32.9 | 25.0 |
C. McCoy
|
G | 1 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 60.0 | 60.0 |
B. Sztenderowicz
|
G | 1 | 23.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
P. Smith
|
G | 1 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | -6.0 | 12 | 0.9 | 13.6 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.11 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
D. Mack
|
G | 1 | 20.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 28.4 | 0 |
Rae McClarty
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S. Lefler
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
A. Catanzaro
|
F | 1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
S. Acosta
|
C | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
J. Owens
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Desire
|
F | 1 | 22.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | -8.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. Fernandez
|
F | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Adriana Misciagna
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Liana Schuler
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG