Iona
Season:
2026
Also known as: Iona
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1032 (#175) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1060 (#163) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1016 (#269) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +2.6 (#320) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.953 (#154) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.953 (#107) | NetEff +19.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.875 (#225) | AdjNet +16.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.877 (#229) | AdjNet +16.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.716 (#243) | AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 58.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.539 (#274) | AdjO 63.7 | AdjD 62.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.663 (#223) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.643 (#234) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1088 (#142) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabellah Middleton | - | 1 | 28.9 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 15.0 | 21.0 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 59.5 | 50.0 |
| Naomi Barnwell | - | 1 | 31.9 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 18.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 47.7 | 44.4 |
| Mya Zaccagnini | - | 1 | 31.3 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 27.6 | 25.0 |
| Ella Fajardo | - | 1 | 18.1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
| Zoey Ward | - | 1 | 25.9 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 23.1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 23.1 | 23.1 |
| Claudia Fiel | - | 1 | 30.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Ale Civera | - | 1 | 28.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Johanna Flores | - | 1 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Adrianna Gonzalez | - | 1 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36 | 3.0 | 17.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.75 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG