🐻⬇️🏀

Indiana (PA)

Season: 2026 2023 2022 2020
Also known as: Indiana (PA)
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1094 (#159) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1011 (#361) HCA +62 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +15.8 (#152) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.965 (#184) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +33.8 More → 0.981 (#137) AdjNet +33.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +33.6 More → 0.981 (#140) AdjNet +33.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 83.9 | AdjD 59.5 More → 0.903 (#119) AdjO 83.9 | AdjD 59.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.4 | AdjD 61.4 More → 0.655 (#173) AdjO 68.4 | AdjD 61.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.790 (#135) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.760 (#155) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-21 vs Chatham W 88 - 66

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Nyshae' Weaver - 1 19.6 15.0 5.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 17.0 - - - 77.8 0.0 100.0 - 79.4 77.8
Teresa Maggio - 1 19.2 14.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 - - - 71.4 80.0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Alexis Buie - 1 12.6 12.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 8.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 102.0 100.0
Madison Zavasky - 1 20.8 10.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 13.0 - - - 57.1 0.0 100.0 - 63.5 57.1
Ali Hardwell - 1 24.6 10.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 9.0 7.0 - - - 44.4 0.0 50.0 - 46.5 44.4
Bella Peterson - 1 28.6 6.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 8.0 55 4.2 210.9 40.0 33.3 50.0 -0.22 51.0 50.0
Marin Miller - 1 19.7 6.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 96 5.1 47.6 60.0 0.0 0 2.85 60.0 60.0
Ellie Wilkerson - 1 15.1 5.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 - - - 40.0 33.3 0 - 50.0 50.0
Belle Bosch - 1 12.8 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Isabella Vent - 1 10.8 3.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 7.0 - - - 25.0 50.0 0 - 37.5 37.5
Molly Keane - 1 16.3 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 -1.0 - - - 25.0 0 50.0 - 30.7 25.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG