🐻⬇️🏀

Idaho

Season: 2026 2024 2017
Also known as: Idaho
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1039 (#150) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1059 (#171) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1039 (#174) HCA +75 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +19.6 (#92) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.985 (#127) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +37.1 More → 0.986 (#80) NetEff +37.1
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +35.6 More → 0.984 (#90) AdjNet +35.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +34.2 More → 0.983 (#98) AdjNet +34.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 78.9 | AdjD 56.3 More → 0.886 (#95) AdjO 78.9 | AdjD 56.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 72.0 | AdjD 64.2 More → 0.671 (#101) AdjO 72.0 | AdjD 64.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.832 (#70) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.805 (#87) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 290 | GP 1 More → 1138 (#88) RD 290 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-12-20 vs Western Ore. W 91 - 63

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Ana Pinheiro - 1 28.3 19.0 5.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 15.0 9.0 - - - 53.3 37.5 0 - 63.3 63.3
Hope Hassmann - 1 26.6 18.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 13.0 10.0 - - - 46.2 50.0 80.0 - 59.2 53.8
Kyra Gardner - 1 24.9 12.0 12.0 10.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 12.0 26.0 - - - 41.7 33.3 0 - 50.0 50.0
Sarah Brans - 1 17.2 11.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 10.0 - - - 83.3 100.0 0.0 - 85.4 91.7
Ana Beatriz Passos Alves da Silva - 1 21.4 8.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 4.0 - - - 57.1 0.0 0 - 57.1 57.1
Catelyn Deaver - 1 12.8 8.0 7.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 11.0 - - - 60.0 0 66.7 - 63.3 60.0
Ella Uriarte - 1 33.1 5.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 - - - 33.3 50.0 0 - 41.7 41.7
Lorena Barbosa - 1 10.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 0 - 40.0 40.0
Katlin Kangur - 1 10.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 9.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - 52.1 50.0
Sofia Ekh - 1 14.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 - - - 33.3 33.3 0 - 50.0 50.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG