🐻⬇️🏀

IU Indy

Season: 2026
Also known as: IU Indy
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1061 (#216) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1029 (#254) HCA +62 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +29.0 (#75) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.996 (#140) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +29.1 More → 0.967 (#152) AdjNet +29.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +28.1 More → 0.967 (#154) AdjNet +28.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 78.1 | AdjD 56.2 More → 0.880 (#133) AdjO 78.1 | AdjD 56.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.7 | AdjD 57.9 More → 0.709 (#116) AdjO 67.7 | AdjD 57.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.879 (#77) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.849 (#99) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 1106 (#149) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-26 vs Anderson (IN) W 94 - 58

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Nevaeh Foster - 1 23.4 22.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 16.0 18.0 - - - 56.2 0.0 100.0 - 61.9 56.2
Kamara Mills - 1 22.3 19.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.0 13.0 81 3.7 16.0 63.6 50.0 50.0 1.1 74.5 77.3
Destini Craig - 1 19.2 12.0 5.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 13.0 - - - 71.4 50.0 50.0 - 76.1 78.6
Jemma Amoore - 1 17.3 11.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 12.0 - - - 80.0 100.0 50.0 - 81.4 90.0
Olivia Smith - 1 10.7 9.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 9.0 - - - 60.0 50.0 100.0 - 76.5 70.0
E'Zaria Adams - 1 17.8 8.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 5 0.3 1.2 42.9 0.0 100.0 0.29 50.8 42.9
Camron Blank - 1 13.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 - - - 50.0 66.7 0 - 75.0 75.0
Ariana Williams - 1 15.4 4.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 5.0 59 3.0 14.6 28.6 0.0 0 1.91 28.6 28.6
Kaylin Moorehead - 1 7.7 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0
Julia Hall - 1 12.9 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 6.3 0.0
Denali Craig-Edwards - 1 16.8 0.0 5.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Hailey Smith - 1 13.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 -33 -2.1 -55.5 0.0 0 0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Sydney Bolden - 1 10.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG